rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 15 days agoThey don't like the rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square149linkfedilinkarrow-up1512arrow-down187
arrow-up1425arrow-down1imageThey don't like the rulelemmy.blahaj.zonerockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square149linkfedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down7·15 days agoturns out, humans can be informed. and ethics are about how we treat other people.
minus-squareHagdos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoThat’s why my remark about young kids. You can’t inform a 2-year old. I don’t see why ethics should be limited to humans only.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days ago I don’t see why ethics should be limited to humans only. because that’s exactly what ethics dictate: how humans treat each other. it’s a speciesist enterprise.
minus-squareSuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·15 days ago other people I notice you didn’t say “other humans” there. I think that speaks for itself.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·15 days agoit says what it means. bad faith interpretations don’t change it.
turns out, humans can be informed. and ethics are about how we treat other people.
That’s why my remark about young kids. You can’t inform a 2-year old.
I don’t see why ethics should be limited to humans only.
because that’s exactly what ethics dictate: how humans treat each other. it’s a speciesist enterprise.
I notice you didn’t say “other humans” there. I think that speaks for itself.
it says what it means. bad faith interpretations don’t change it.