slothrop @lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17 天前rapist rulelemmy.caimagemessage-square293linkfedilinkarrow-up11.39Karrow-down140file-text
arrow-up11.35Karrow-down1imagerapist rulelemmy.caslothrop @lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17 天前message-square293linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·17 天前What we were wearing at the time of our attack was not an invitation for violence.
minus-squareNotAnOtter@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·17 天前Do you think the lesson in that metaphor is that I think women should be wearing helmets…? It’s not meant literally.
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·17 天前It’s not my fault you can’t connect the dots here. You’re still blaming victims for not wearing helmets when they’re hit by the driver instead of placing the blame on the driver for hitting the cyclist.
minus-squareNotAnOtter@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·17 天前This isn’t productive so I’m going to stop responding to your bad faith bait. Try rereading the metaphor. Because I directly addressed who’s at fault.
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·17 天前 But you should still wear a helmet
What we were wearing at the time of our attack was not an invitation for violence.
Do you think the lesson in that metaphor is that I think women should be wearing helmets…?
It’s not meant literally.
It’s not my fault you can’t connect the dots here.
You’re still blaming victims for not wearing helmets when they’re hit by the driver instead of placing the blame on the driver for hitting the cyclist.
This isn’t productive so I’m going to stop responding to your bad faith bait.
Try rereading the metaphor. Because I directly addressed who’s at fault.