InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agoMap of real cities in Americahexbear.netimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1154arrow-down1imageMap of real cities in Americahexbear.netInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to traingang@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarestolid_agnostic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-22 years agoSurprised not to see San Francisco at 30%+. It’s got a great transit system with very high utilization, though maybe it’s regions rather than cities that are analyzed here.
minus-squarezephyreks [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoCalling BART and Caltrain “great” is a bit of a stretch.
minus-squareMardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoEven compared to the system in, say, Sydney, it sucks. Heck, it sucks compared to Auckland’s famously bad public transit.
minus-squareGaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 years agoMap says metro area so it has to include North and East Bay there Also doesn’t account for all the walkers, bikers, and rollerbladers
Surprised not to see San Francisco at 30%+. It’s got a great transit system with very high utilization, though maybe it’s regions rather than cities that are analyzed here.
Calling BART and Caltrain “great” is a bit of a stretch.
Even compared to the system in, say, Sydney, it sucks. Heck, it sucks compared to Auckland’s famously bad public transit.
Map says metro area so it has to include North and East Bay there
Also doesn’t account for all the walkers, bikers, and rollerbladers