James R Kirk@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 2 days agoData is so helpfulstartrek.websiteimagemessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up1278arrow-down10
arrow-up1278arrow-down1imageData is so helpfulstartrek.websiteJames R Kirk@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square11linkfedilink
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 days agoI always thought Star Trek took place after February 1993.
minus-squarenomecks@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoThey would have violated the temporal prime directive by making the reference to the audience in 1992
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoThey already did.
minus-squareCorgana@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoThe events of Star Trek haven’t taken place yet, but The Historical Documents aired long before that. Presumably some kind of time vortex brought them to us.
I always thought Star Trek took place after February 1993.
They would have violated the temporal prime directive by making the reference to the audience in 1992
They already did.
The events of Star Trek haven’t taken place yet, but The Historical Documents aired long before that. Presumably some kind of time vortex brought them to us.
Some episodes did