I mean, I guess “impeccable safety record” is in the eye of the beholder?

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    So OP provided a citation from the NSHTA report on how FSD disengages before a crash which has been in the news a lot when it first was revealed and I provided a journalistist investigation that found Tesla is potentially fudging their statistics with FSD.

    Plenty of citations there to make a case.

    Your turn to once again provide a citation to back up your case.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      This whole chain is a response to

      Teslas are programmed to turn off autopilot half a second before a crash so statistics can say “autopilot was off at the time of the crash”.

      And no one has anything to support that.

      Please add a citation to support that before you insist on citations to support disagreeing with an unsupported claim

      Note my previous response (accidentally responded to the nhtsa thing in the past with an edit)

      Im not disagreeing that FSD can disengage just before a crash, just arguing that I’ve not seen them try to shift blame based on it and I remember reading somewhere that it’s intentional to try to mitigate the aftermath

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Done playing chess with a pigeon and you trying desperately to strawman.

        Simply provide your citations for your original argument.