I have explained everything with a lot more details in other comments.
Read them before you hastily conclude that I don’t know what I’m talking about, because I’m not gonna repeat myself again and again to people that polarized; you’re falling into a non-sequitur fallacy from a fallacy of appeal to ignorance and a fallacy of the straw man.
I have explained everything with a lot more details in other comments
Doesn’t seem to be showing in your profile, got a link?
Read them before you hastily conclude that I don’t know what I’m talking about
It wasn’t that hasty, you made it pretty obvious, but I still waited til you removed all doubt.
you’re falling into a non-sequitur fallacy from a fallacy of appeal to ignorance and a fallacy of the straw man.
And now I’m starting to think you don’t know what any of those things mean either, since none of them apply here. But when you come back with that link that totally exists that shows you’ve ever demonstrated a single bit of knowledge about China’s government, you can also explain how anything I said meets the definition of those fallacies, and we can all have a good laugh.
I have explained everything with a lot more details in other comments. Read them before you hastily conclude that I don’t know what I’m talking about, because I’m not gonna repeat myself again and again to people that polarized; you’re falling into a non-sequitur fallacy from a fallacy of appeal to ignorance and a fallacy of the straw man.
Doesn’t seem to be showing in your profile, got a link?
It wasn’t that hasty, you made it pretty obvious, but I still waited til you removed all doubt.
And now I’m starting to think you don’t know what any of those things mean either, since none of them apply here. But when you come back with that link that totally exists that shows you’ve ever demonstrated a single bit of knowledge about China’s government, you can also explain how anything I said meets the definition of those fallacies, and we can all have a good laugh.