He discovered a land with hundreds of millions of people already living there. Then the Europeans genocided the fuck out of them. He should be remembered as one of histories greatest villains, not a fun adventurer.
I dunno if you noticed but the definition has absolutely nothing to do with being in public office, lol. People are being persuaded into believing Columbus was a fun explorer and he’s the reason civility was brought to the americas, when in fact the only export was barbarism, death, famine, and bloodshed.
I see nothing wrong in commemorating him. What is the problem with that? What does commemorating an historic figure have to do with propaganda?
He genocided thousands of natives. He’s a piece of shit, lol.
That does not take away the relevance of his discovery.
He discovered a land with hundreds of millions of people already living there. Then the Europeans genocided the fuck out of them. He should be remembered as one of histories greatest villains, not a fun adventurer.
Removed by mod
Lol. What is he taught as? Do you know what the word propaganda means?
Removed by mod
I dunno if you noticed but the definition has absolutely nothing to do with being in public office, lol. People are being persuaded into believing Columbus was a fun explorer and he’s the reason civility was brought to the americas, when in fact the only export was barbarism, death, famine, and bloodshed.
You are not immune to propaganda.
Removed by mod
He didn’t discover America either.
People were there, it is obvious he was not the first human to get there. So what?
The fact that he went there significantly changed the lives of people living in Europe and people living in the Americas for the following centuries.
Yeah, and that is the damn problem. The change was for the worse.
A valid opinion, should history only record people who made great changes to the world and forget about the ones which did bad changes?