• fleebleneeble@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Art takes human effort and creativity. And of course there are multiple mediums, AI just isn’t one of them. I’m not gatekeeping anything, just stating fact. I’m sorry you have zero talent and rely on stealing others work to pass off as your own.

    • BJW@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yes, and as we all know, there is no human involved when AI is used. The computer spontaneously has an idea, specifies all the details, reviews the results, tweaks them, and continues refinement until the computers own vision is achieved. It does this by sketching the work of others who have already created what it wants; and because all art that can be created, has already been created, this is possible solely through theft. The computers final output is a replica of someone else’s art, and at no point is a person involved in the process.

      I am also stating facts, fellow art gatekeeper.

      • fleebleneeble@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        There’s no point in arguing with a moron. Keep it up showcasing your idiocy. 😘

        • edit: engaging with a moron. Either works.
        • BJW@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Who is arguing? I am simply reaffirming the unassailable truth that you spout, as only a true art gatekeeper can. Only we can decide what is art, and what is not, and a computer stealing art by making duplicates of existing art, without any human input whatsoever, is definitely not art.

          …You never did tell me what sticks you prefer to use, what kind of sand, and how you blindfold yourself… I’m beginning to suspect you’re not actually an artist. You probably make electro-slop, right?