noxfriend@beehaw.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agonewest tech stack just droppedbeehaw.orgimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1104arrow-down10
arrow-up1104arrow-down1imagenewest tech stack just droppedbeehaw.orgnoxfriend@beehaw.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squareButtons@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·edit-22 years agoStill easier than understanding JavaScript’s equality operator
minus-squareSmorty@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoYou think you? I felt like Java Script was easy
minus-squareHexarei@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years agoSure, it’s easy: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
minus-squareMars@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 years agoIt’s super funny, but if you don’t try to use things as what they are not, the type coercion can’t hurt you. But if you make a tradition of trying to add empty objects and numbers… The great sin of JavaScript is gracefully (silently) failing when coders do silly things.
minus-squareSmorty@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoWow this was good. Thanks for sharing this gem.
Still easier than understanding JavaScript’s equality operator
You think you? I felt like Java Script was easy
Sure, it’s easy: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
It’s super funny, but if you don’t try to use things as what they are not, the type coercion can’t hurt you.
But if you make a tradition of trying to add empty objects and numbers…
The great sin of JavaScript is gracefully (silently) failing when coders do silly things.
Wow this was good. Thanks for sharing this gem.