Nazi re-revisionisticallydogwhistling: Nazis can use this to dogwhistles with each other exactly how Norse symbols have been revisioned. Norse culture has nothing to do with Naziprop, but they can reutilize this.
I can def. see this as reclaiming tactics in say anarchist zones. But in neutral zones it could be utilized double-edged.
Reading comprehension is something we all have to encourage. Try either finding a master tutor to guide you in antifa praxis, or rereading with a strong Black Anarchist perspective.
Let’s see. You called for a “master tutor” of “antifa praxis” but let’s assume that was a joke. You posted a link to one of your own comments and described it as “strong”. And now you’re implying that your own comment, when read correctly, is able to single-handedly motivate people into direct acion. It all seems a bit patronising.
I’m a talker, it’s how we solidify.
Did you by any chance had the time to reread the thread from Quokka’s frontend?
’Cause people in PyLova can already see the little breadcrumbs I left regarding my intersectionary ways.
Nazi re-revisionistically dogwhistling: Nazis can use this to dogwhistles with each other exactly how Norse symbols have been revisioned. Norse culture has nothing to do with Naziprop, but they can reutilize this.
I can def. see this as reclaiming tactics in say anarchist zones. But in neutral zones it could be utilized double-edged.
Telling people not to paint over Swastikas that sounds like a dogwhistle
Reading comprehension is something we all have to encourage. Try either finding a master tutor to guide you in antifa praxis, or rereading with a strong Black Anarchist perspective.
They might have read your comment better than you did yourself.
Then they would be composting Nazis, and making better arrows.
But I am sure that’s what the “not-worth-reading” had in mind, right?
Let’s see. You called for a “master tutor” of “antifa praxis” but let’s assume that was a joke. You posted a link to one of your own comments and described it as “strong”. And now you’re implying that your own comment, when read correctly, is able to single-handedly motivate people into direct acion. It all seems a bit patronising.
Could you be a dear and point to who patronized who?
I was referring to the stuff you wrote after that but it’s fine if you don’t want to talk about it.
I’m a talker, it’s how we solidify.
Did you by any chance had the time to reread the thread from Quokka’s frontend?
’Cause people in PyLova can already see the little breadcrumbs I left regarding my intersectionary ways.
Let’s see, do you know about turf warfare?
You’re really over thinking this.
I wish.
Same energy.