cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/55297201

Archived

A Chinese political dissident who had fled to South Korea last month in a dinghy has arrived in Canada, his friend said on social media on Saturday.

Dong Guangping was aboard a 3.3-meter (10.8-foot) inflatable boat in the waters off a western South Korean island in May when he was detained by South Korea’s coast guard for allegedly violating the country’s immigration law. It was his fourth known attempt to flee China.

Appearing at a court hearing in South Korea, he told reporters that he hopes to go to Canada to reunite with his wife and daughters, who have already been resettled there, according to South Korean media.

In a post Saturday on X, his friend Sheng Xue, a Chinese Canadian activist, said Dong had landed in Toronto following an Air Canada flight on Friday.

“He just had a big bowl of noodles with eggs, tomatoes and shrimps,” she wrote in the post, adding that she has spent more than 10 years trying to get him out of China.

[…]

  • TimothyOilpants@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Got it, so YOUR country’s government has the right to decide what people can and cannot promote publicly, but other countries do not.

    I see you are big on nuance…

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      The importing country decides based on human rights and other criteria. Do you not know how amnesty, asylum and refugee status works?

      Its why those exist to protect political prisoners.

      I feel like I’m talking with a paid Chinese bot.

      • TimothyOilpants@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Interesting take that anyone who doesn’t agree with the utility of western style representative democracy must be a spy or a robot…

        Do you feel like elected officials in Canada speak to the needs and desires of the working class more often than not? Do YOU feel well represented in Ottawa?

        If like 80% of Canadian citizens, you were born and raised here; have you ever taken any time to consider the miraculous coincidence that the system you were born into just happens to be the “right” one? Is that just luck of the draw for you, or is it possible you’ve been indoctrinated?

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I wasn’t born in Canada, and didn’t say one country has moral right, but there are human rights and international backed asylum. Countries on either side use it all the time.

          • TimothyOilpants@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            …and again I ask; you are 100% confident that the prevailing world order, largely established by Britain, America, and NATO more broadly, is the lens through which we should view human good?

            To paraphrase what you said earlier: just because a system exists doesn’t mean it’s just or right.

            Doesn’t it seem a little suspect that a thing isn’t considered “bad” or objectionable until NATO members stop doing it?

            The current world order was built on centuries of racism, oppression, slavery, and foreign interference; with a helping hand from 780,000,000,000 tonnes of atmospheric CO2 emission… Maybe we shouldn’t see that perspective as the moral high ground?

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              You drag in so many strawman non sequitor type stuff that I can’t have this conversation with you. You are likely a paid social media account trying to cause trouble based on the pattern of speech

              • TimothyOilpants@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Questions aren’t strawmen… the opposite actually. Challenging my integrity because you disagree with me IS an ad hominem attack though.

                The intellectual exercise of challenging your upbringing, indoctrination, and convictions is too much for a lot of people.

                Characterize me however you need to in order to avoid those uncomfortable questions about your own bias though…Have a good one.