Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 天前Finally an explanationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square280linkfedilinkarrow-up1816arrow-down142cross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1774arrow-down1imageFinally an explanationlemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 天前message-square280linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squareBeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·8 天前I remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it’s a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.
minus-squareHonytawk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·8 天前Indeed. If one side breaks the contract, the other isn’t bound by it anymore either.
I remember being told it makes more sense when you realize it’s a part of the social contract. Breaching it prevents you from taking part in it.
Indeed. If one side breaks the contract, the other isn’t bound by it anymore either.