- cross-posted to:
- vegantifa@lemmygrad.ml
- vegan@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- vegantifa@lemmygrad.ml
- vegan@lemmy.ml
Here’s what I find fascinating: the moment veganism enters the conversation, the script flips.
“I can’t change anything.”
“My individual choice doesn’t matter.”
“It’s too small to have an impact.”
Really?
Because what is veganism, structurally, if not a boycott?
A boycott of industries built on animal exploitation. A refusal to fund a system of needless cruelty. A withdrawal of demand.
The exact same mechanism.
The exact same logic — just applied consistently, every day, instead of episodically when a scandal trends.
Someone will object at this point: “Veganism is a niche concern — it doesn’t have the potential for a mass boycott.”
But think about what that claim actually reveals. Not a rebuttal — just a confession of how little the person has looked into it.
Veganism already is a mass boycott. A remarkably effective one. In terms of global participation, the refusal to use animal products may well be the largest boycott in recorded history.
Veganism is also simply the values already heldby the overwhelming majority of society put into action. Just applied without arbitrary exceptions. The “niche concern” label is more convenient than it is accurate.
Animal exploitation and cruelty are things many people still pay for — but not things many people actually stand behind. Many can’t even bring themselves to look at what they’re funding.
Add in the staggering environmental and health consequences of animal farming, and the case stops being philosophical and becomes almost mundane.
Thank you for also posting the contents here so I don’t have to give substack traffic lol



