seaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agoWhat could go wrong giving the Inte(r)net (u)nfi(l)ter(e)d access to DallE 3?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1356arrow-down10
arrow-up1356arrow-down1imageWhat could go wrong giving the Inte(r)net (u)nfi(l)ter(e)d access to DallE 3?lemmy.worldseaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareVuraniute@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 years agomicrosoft’s content safety algorithms with dall-e 3 are strict as fuck, though
minus-squaretryagain@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 years agoMy grandmother, who passed away last week, kept a beautiful portrait over her fireplace of the goatse guy flying a jet into the twin towers.
minus-squareSmorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-22 years agoThat’s why the post mentions unfiltered.
minus-squareVuraniute@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agobut the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?
minus-squareVuraniute@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agowhat does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?
microsoft’s content safety algorithms with dall-e 3 are strict as fuck, though
My grandmother, who passed away last week, kept a beautiful portrait over her fireplace of the goatse guy flying a jet into the twin towers.
That’s why the post mentions unfiltered.
but the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?
Not with that attitude.
what does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?