There are two avenues of attack: against his supported policies, and against his person.
I haven’t seen any effective discussion, let alone attacks, against his policies. Everything is against his person.
The best his policies can be assailed is by casting doubt on him as a person. Since he isn’t actively campaigning on supporting genocide, the lobby against him needs to draw attention away from his expressed policies.
Because ultimately his election would be a massive blow to the status quo.
There are two avenues of attack: against his supported policies, and against his person.
I haven’t seen any effective discussion, let alone attacks, against his policies. Everything is against his person.
The best his policies can be assailed is by casting doubt on him as a person. Since he isn’t actively campaigning on supporting genocide, the lobby against him needs to draw attention away from his expressed policies.
Because ultimately his election would be a massive blow to the status quo.
If I could make this a distinguished comment, I would.