- cross-posted to:
- colorado@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- colorado@lemmy.world
Wildlife habitat, endangered animals and recreation could all be at risk in state’s biggest public land sale in modern history.
Wildlife habitat, endangered animals and recreation could all be at risk in state’s biggest public land sale in modern history.
On a potentially positive note, they’ve done this before, to little success.
First term Trump attempted to sell off Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and they essentially had no serious takers. While the MAGAs give zero damns about the environment, anyone looking at these leases know how controversial they are. Groups like the National Audubon Society will sue to delay/deter resource extraction, and there will be public protests and other bad reactions.
Also, as pointed out in this article, financiers also know that despite having a permission slip signed, getting those resources out of the ground is not going to be popular, and they will not put up the money to do anything with those leases.
The reason they will continue to offer these leases, despite them not likely to be taken seriously, is the goverment still makes money off the leases even if no resources are extracted. It’s free money for them.
Gov lines some pockets, they get to tell the Drill, Baby, Drill chuds “mission accomplished”, and the only companies that bought the leases where fly by night nobodies that have never drilled for oil anywhere.
So it still sucks they’re trying this. We still need to fight to stop it. But it’s far from a done deal, goodbye environment, and we shouldn’t let it deter us from trying to save our environment.