My prejudice will last if only by principle. I may not be the majority, but my god. If I know I can read something written out of passion by someone made of flesh and blood, I’m not going to waste my time reading something generated by something that’s never experience the sun on their skin. That’s the difference. I’m not prejudiced against people. I’m prejudiced against virtual skin walkers.
Prejudices do tend to persist and that is your business, I am human and I am as invested in a human future as you are, my point only is that if you can not tell from the work itself that it is machine written then you are not discarding it on the grounds of literary appreciation which is the only way writing should be judged. Plus AI is a human construct and trained upon and represents a condensation of human efforts. In that sense AI output might be viewed as just another human expression.
My prejudice will last if only by principle. I may not be the majority, but my god. If I know I can read something written out of passion by someone made of flesh and blood, I’m not going to waste my time reading something generated by something that’s never experience the sun on their skin. That’s the difference. I’m not prejudiced against people. I’m prejudiced against virtual skin walkers.
Prejudices do tend to persist and that is your business, I am human and I am as invested in a human future as you are, my point only is that if you can not tell from the work itself that it is machine written then you are not discarding it on the grounds of literary appreciation which is the only way writing should be judged. Plus AI is a human construct and trained upon and represents a condensation of human efforts. In that sense AI output might be viewed as just another human expression.
writing doesn’t necessarily need to be judged in “literary appreciation”.
Though it does fit as the most general case currently.