• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    what you’d actually see is increased unemployment, because that’s the most effective regulator of salaries. the system requires a mass of people without jobs in order to balance itself.

    • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      the system requires a mass of people without jobs in order to balance itself.

      I don’t know where you got this idea, it seems more like the system requires desperate people and lack of jobs does help in causing that. However, fuck the system

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        it’s pretty simple; given offers of two identical jobs with different benefits, you’d pick the better one. if there isn’t enough people to fill all open positions, employers need to compete by raising benefits. in short, price follows demand. the more people that are looking for jobs, the lower employers can push salaries and still hire someone.

        when neolibs campaign on how “everyone should have a job” and use that as an excuse to cut unemployment benefits, that’s them trying to distract from the fact that unemployment is necessary for the system they built to function. as unemployment approaches zero, salaries approach infinity.

        so yeah, fuck that system.