ora@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17 days agoThe letter of the rule, if not the spiritmidwest.socialimagemessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down18
arrow-up1113arrow-down1imageThe letter of the rule, if not the spiritmidwest.socialora@midwest.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square53linkfedilink
minus-squarehakase@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·17 days agoIt’s not “near infinitely larger” since there are a finite number of numbers before it and an infinite number after it - it’s nowhere close to “near infinitely larger”
minus-squareReptilianCleric@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·17 days agoI would say it’s incomprehensibly larger, though, which is what I took your meaning for in the first place.
It’s not “near infinitely larger” since there are a finite number of numbers before it and an infinite number after it - it’s nowhere close to “near infinitely larger”
Fair enough
I would say it’s incomprehensibly larger, though, which is what I took your meaning for in the first place.
∞ ↑↑↑↑↑… ↑↑↑∞