• BougieBirdie@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve heard a rumour that someone in my town is suing the city because they put up one-meter tall concrete dividers for a bike lane, and they drove into one and flipped over their car. Total write-off

    Like, you absolute buffoon, you drove into a wall. Where do you think the blame should lie?

    • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 days ago

      That is literally why the most you tend to see is plastic bollards or just a painted line. The cities don’t want to deal with the lawsuits from angry drivers that are more concerned with the damage to their cars than the life they just took.

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Fatalities caused by vehicles aren’t even treated as homicides in the US. What do you expect from this 3rd world country?

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        There is a little more to it than that.

        A barrier has to start somewhere. The blunt end is considered a hazard for cars if it is too close to the lane, called the clear zone. That blunt end is considered very dangerous and either needs to be located out of the clear zone or have expensive and large crash cushions protecting the blunt end.

        It is going to be very difficult finding a civil engineer who will approve installing a blunt end right next to an active travel lane. That makes it useless if you’re trying to protect a bike lane next to traffic.

        • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Somehow I doubt a curb is going to impede emergency vehicles to any significant degree. The money is a pittance.