Greed is greed, which is also a sin. Gluttony specifically refers to food. You’re just lying at this point, intentionally or not, you’re spreading misinformation.
There are 5 specific types of gluttony, and none of them involve wealth hoarding.
Laute - This is eating costly and luxurious foods when a sandwich would tide you over. It’s one thing to have a fine meal every once in a while, but it’s a bit much if it’s every night. The extra money spent on the finest foods your palate desires could go towards feeding someone who has nothing.
Studiose - Eating too daintily, which means you’re an excessively picky eater who wastes great energy on meal preparation or pursuing delicacies. Energy that’d be more wisely used elsewhere.
Nimis - This is what people typically think of when it comes to gluttony. These are those who eat beyond the point of satiety and fullness.
Praepropere - These are those who eat at the improper time or too soon after eating an earlier meal.
Ardenter - Those who eat too eagerly and derive all of life’s satisfaction from their eating experiences. I take this one too mean when they are ready to eat, eating is all they can think about.
Please stop making shit up. If you don’t understand what a word means, it’s ok to do some research or even just keep your mouth shut to avoid spreading misinformation.
If you’ve got no idea what you’re talking about, it’s ok to not talk.
Very interesting points, and I see your point between all five, although except maybe praepropere? while in theory i can see this helps syncronizing communities, especially people with different lives (such as families), to sit down for the same dinner ritual. But in practice I have friends and family some of whom 1) have very active lifestyles such as running to/from work, and so requires more snacks to keep stable energy levels and 2) they have different eating habits for other reasons such as avoiding the psychological effects of truly feeling hungry. In either way, we keep having shared dinner rituals, they just eat different amounts.
So i dont really see how the is a bad lifestyle or some ethical shortcoming, but just a rule to adhere to a specific social norm.
Interesting information but wtf is with that shitty attitude, acting like you’re an authority on what people can talk about? Being wrong isn’t lying. OP reposted something they saw elsewhere and didn’t make anything up.
It’s ok to talk about things, even when you’re wrong about them. IMO that’s the best time to talk about them because then you might realize it due to the resulting comments or conversation. Plus, belief and understanding don’t work like that, where you know when it’s wrong or even questionable before you say it.
Greed is greed, which is also a sin. Gluttony specifically refers to food. You’re just lying at this point, intentionally or not, you’re spreading misinformation.
There are 5 specific types of gluttony, and none of them involve wealth hoarding.
Laute - This is eating costly and luxurious foods when a sandwich would tide you over. It’s one thing to have a fine meal every once in a while, but it’s a bit much if it’s every night. The extra money spent on the finest foods your palate desires could go towards feeding someone who has nothing.
Studiose - Eating too daintily, which means you’re an excessively picky eater who wastes great energy on meal preparation or pursuing delicacies. Energy that’d be more wisely used elsewhere.
Nimis - This is what people typically think of when it comes to gluttony. These are those who eat beyond the point of satiety and fullness.
Praepropere - These are those who eat at the improper time or too soon after eating an earlier meal.
Ardenter - Those who eat too eagerly and derive all of life’s satisfaction from their eating experiences. I take this one too mean when they are ready to eat, eating is all they can think about.
Please stop making shit up. If you don’t understand what a word means, it’s ok to do some research or even just keep your mouth shut to avoid spreading misinformation.
If you’ve got no idea what you’re talking about, it’s ok to not talk.
This guy reads Aquinas.
Very interesting points, and I see your point between all five, although except maybe praepropere? while in theory i can see this helps syncronizing communities, especially people with different lives (such as families), to sit down for the same dinner ritual. But in practice I have friends and family some of whom 1) have very active lifestyles such as running to/from work, and so requires more snacks to keep stable energy levels and 2) they have different eating habits for other reasons such as avoiding the psychological effects of truly feeling hungry. In either way, we keep having shared dinner rituals, they just eat different amounts.
So i dont really see how the is a bad lifestyle or some ethical shortcoming, but just a rule to adhere to a specific social norm.
Interesting information but wtf is with that shitty attitude, acting like you’re an authority on what people can talk about? Being wrong isn’t lying. OP reposted something they saw elsewhere and didn’t make anything up.
It’s ok to talk about things, even when you’re wrong about them. IMO that’s the best time to talk about them because then you might realize it due to the resulting comments or conversation. Plus, belief and understanding don’t work like that, where you know when it’s wrong or even questionable before you say it.