• grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    Good, maybe we wouldn’t be such a bunch of wastrels if we weren’t running around because a website might go down or meeting might be delayed if we don’t rush

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      My job involves fixing machines that unload container ships.

      If one breaks down mid vessel it needs to be up and running, my poor performance has a massive flow on effect around the world

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Or maybe Just-In-Time supply chains should be heavily regulated. Companies using cargo freighters as warehouse space inevitably leads to everything grinding to a halt when anything gets delayed during shipping. Know how companies used to avoid short-term supply chain issues? They had enough stock in their warehouse to last more than a single fucking day at a time.

        But manufacturing companies realized that instead of paying for warehouse space to store excess raw material, they could just throw massive fucking hissy fits whenever a shipping container gets delayed. And the MBAs gave it a nice pretty name (JIT) to make themselves feel smart. And now shipping companies get blamed when manufacturing grinds to a halt, instead of blaming the manufacturers that failed to plan for a single day of shipping delays.

        And manufacturing that has the potential to cascade into critical/infrastructure delays shouldn’t be allowed to use JIT. Very little would be impacted when a popsicle stick manufacturer has a JIT delay. But a lot of people would care if chemicals used in water treatment plants got delayed, and they suddenly had no clean drinking water.

        • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yeah but a day here then the ship leaves late, a day at the next port and the next its never good.

          Things tend to always run behind as is. We get notified ships in from 21 to 24ty etc then 2 days before its thr 22nd to the 25th a almost every time

      • falcunculus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Does it though? Where does the “need” in your sentence come from?

        How come the supply chain has no slack to allow for (inevitable) hiccups and accidents? The answer is two part. It used to have them but they were optimized away. It still has them, but you are led to believe they aren’t there because putting this pressure on you allows your bosses to extract more work out of you.

        And how come the supply chain is so stressed? Is everything that goes through it so essential that a single late ship is a catastrophe? The answer is obviously not, we are shipping gigatons of drivel across the world that gets immediately forgotten in a drawer or tossed in the bin once it reaches its final destination.

        If you are shipping essential goods then there is a safety net of supplies at the destination to absorb any issues in shipping (if there isn’t, clearly these goods were not essential). If you aren’t shipping essential goods, then it’s already factored in global insurance markets, and late shipping is merely someone’s bank account getting bigger at a lesser rate.

        • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          I live in a port city everything comes by boat or train at the same place.

          Food everything.

          If the boat over stays its time someone pays for the demurrage.

          It can get up to 100k a day to have a ship sit there.