• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I recently completely finished completely decoupling my life from Google. My GMail account isn’t used for anything of importance anymore. People really should take a moment and think about what would be the consequences if Google suddenly mistakenly deleted their account like that. A lot of people’s entire lives are connected to their GMail account.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      13 days ago

      I have self-hosted my own personal email server since the late 90s. It has been a tedious, often unpleasant chore. I hate email. But it’s the one thing I’ve never compromised on, because to this day they try to tie your identity to your email and giving up control of that seems insane to me. Apps that use your phone number are doing the same thing, but you can’t self-host that, so I won’t use them. I’m sure Signal is very nice and people keep recommending it, but my phone is an untrusted device, and my phone number is an untrusted identity I don’t control. I am not going to use it for anything important.

      • UndergroundParking@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I remember reading Signal got rid of the hard requirement of a phone number. Haven’t tried it as I’ve already got it attached to my number. At least starting a chat with someone new I didn’t have to give them my number, used signal’s internal id.

      • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        YouTube is fine by me. I don’t care that they track my activity there because they use it to recommend videos and I usually only go there when I have time to waste, which actually makes sense. My YouTube account is its own thing that I don’t use for anything else too. On top of that I use ad blockers so they can’t even make money off of me. If anything, I cost them money by using YouTube.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      If anyone has any suggestions for an alternative to Google Docs for my university essays that can track my writing literally word for word, I would be forever grateful. Getting really tired of having professors flag me for AI use just because I can string sentences together with an em-dash, and also getting tired of feeding all my essays to Gemini.

      • Slashme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        It’s not word for word, but a git repository with frequent commits with meaningful descriptions is easy to do, and then you can push to codeberg or wherever to have backups. That’s cryptographically signed and therefore strong evidence of what you wrote when, and what you were thinking.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          That’s cryptographically signed and therefore strong evidence of what you wrote when, and what you were thinking.

          This logic doesn’t work out in the given place.

          Cryptographical signatures are used to determine that the thingy was made by the person you trust.
          Problem is, in this case, the creator of those commits is the one that is not being trusted.

          The professor will just go, “Oh you made it with AI and then used git commit!”.

          I have had a similar experience in the past, where I made some MATLAB code for a Mathematics course, which the professor said I had copied from someone else (pre-AI times), because he had given the same assignment to other people in the university. This, he claimed without even looking at what I made and without remembering the specific question he had passed to me.

          • Slashme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            There’s still the trace left showing the reasoning, which is harder to fake than a complete document. The commits and commit comments would show a human style of building a narrative.

            • ulterno@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Yeah, that might make it easier when he feels the need to report the professor to the HOD.
              Except it doesn’t matter when the HOD just wants to shit on you, because they can just say that you are good at AI-ing and that’s how you did it.

        • forestbeasts@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          To be fair, you CAN monkey with timestamps and stuff in git. It is cryptographically proven that a given history results in a given commit hash, but you’re free to rewrite that and just have a new commit hash. If you give anyone else your repo, though, then if you rewrite history later they can be like “huh? this doesn’t match!”.

          Not that that matters much here. Proving beyond a reasonable doubt is the goal, not Absolute 100% Certainty level proof.

        • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          This is really helpful for my CS/mathamatics courses actually, but if you think my English prof is gonna be able to parse a git repository… :/

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Maybe typst.app would work for you, or the likes of a self hosted next loud with only office (which is also an office suite in the browser)