also this genuinely made me mad bc its a level of misanthropy almost. this is a specific strain of anarchism especially divorced from material reality and it ends up advocating for essentially terrorism in the name of idealism
it truly comes from a place of privilege: i have everything i need except for the annoying fucking rules and chaos and violence and destruction of valuable infrastructure i take for granted will be perfect solution so long as we are free from rules!!!. again i do not even deride anarchism generally as ideating a stateless society, i’m talking about whatever this fucker’s on
their meaning of exploitation is vague and amorphous and they dont care about building anything, because this western leftist has never had to worry about starvation, or schools being bombed or a lack of anything. the solution is to destroy key infrastructure theyve never imagined living without for what ends??? and then they say that this should happen everywhere?? it’s only because their ideology is so idealist and impractical that they still endorse it because if ever confronted by how terrible this would be on a grand scale they would probably realize maybe the ideas of the unabomber are bad actually.
childish churlish fucking annoying and they have the gall to be pretentious about it as if this is anything beyond illogical. if you want to fuck off and disappear into the woods, sure, but if you’re like “And i think we should bomb functional societies because it’s ontologically bad to live in a society” ??? gggrgrggghhhh. you want to regress us soooo bad
itreminds me of this tweet im anarchist from fucktown usa please bomb critical infrastructure in other countries and destroy their social security nets returning them to the stone age to free them of their oppression from the state. i dont like to deride anarchists usually but this specific strain is just so chafing to me in a way i cant descrive
Reminds me of this all-time anarchist classic:
“That sounds boring and exploitative and like something I’d have more fun blowing up” of course you do, little man, you’re twelve.
I need to save this image, genuinely made me laugh out loud.
also this genuinely made me mad bc its a level of misanthropy almost. this is a specific strain of anarchism especially divorced from material reality and it ends up advocating for essentially terrorism in the name of idealism
it truly comes from a place of privilege: i have everything i need except for the annoying fucking rules and chaos and violence and destruction of valuable infrastructure i take for granted will be perfect solution so long as we are free from rules!!!. again i do not even deride anarchism generally as ideating a stateless society, i’m talking about whatever this fucker’s on
their meaning of exploitation is vague and amorphous and they dont care about building anything, because this western leftist has never had to worry about starvation, or schools being bombed or a lack of anything. the solution is to destroy key infrastructure theyve never imagined living without for what ends??? and then they say that this should happen everywhere?? it’s only because their ideology is so idealist and impractical that they still endorse it because if ever confronted by how terrible this would be on a grand scale they would probably realize maybe the ideas of the unabomber are bad actually.
childish churlish fucking annoying and they have the gall to be pretentious about it as if this is anything beyond illogical. if you want to fuck off and disappear into the woods, sure, but if you’re like “And i think we should bomb functional societies because it’s ontologically bad to live in a society” ??? gggrgrggghhhh. you want to regress us soooo bad
itreminds me of this tweet im anarchist from fucktown usa please bomb critical infrastructure in other countries and destroy their social security nets returning them to the stone age to free them of their oppression from the state. i dont like to deride anarchists usually but this specific strain is just so chafing to me in a way i cant descrive
i’m confused why people don’t interact seriously with my politics
the politics: twelve year old emo’s aphorism or stunted twenty year old’s shitty witticism as an ideological framework