He upholds the Zapistasas as an example of success “Horizontalism” but fails to recognize that the Zapistas are still, functionally, a state. I guarantee that if the Zapistas somehow managed to seize state power in Mexico and implemented their current policies on that scale, he’d stop supporting them for creating a bourgeois state.
“The vanguard party becomes the new bourgeoisie” is a type of libservantive argument based upon misunderstandings of bourgeois propaganda for the truth.
He upholds the Zapistasas as an example of success “Horizontalism” but fails to recognize that the Zapistas are still, functionally, a state. I guarantee that if the Zapistas somehow managed to seize state power in Mexico and implemented their current policies on that scale, he’d stop supporting them for creating a bourgeois state.
“The vanguard party becomes the new bourgeoisie” is a type of libservantive argument based upon misunderstandings of bourgeois propaganda for the truth.