Error in the text: 1000mW laser with 532nm wavelength which is green light.

1000nm light is infrared.

  • FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    That would be a class IV laser and dangerous to eyesight merely from the light scattered off surfaces you point it at. If you point it at a camera and watch what is happening for a while you could get irreversible eye damage.

    There is nothing special about cameras that makes them vulnerable - if you shine such a laser at a person, you’ll likely burn them too. If the beam shines or bounces into your eye, you will likely burn your retina before you can even blink.

    This is not a meme or a shitpost, it is very dangerous.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Aircraft don’t always have transponders on so can’t rely on flight trackers

          Imagine blinding a [military] pilot even just for the briefest moment. We can’t keep them in the sky on a good day for reasons I don’t understand (they’ll hit commercial aircraft or vice versa!)

          Places like Santa Cruz simply fought these spy cams with their voices. Riseeee upppp, no votes for any city councilpeople who are OK Flocking up their own turf

  • FatherPeanut@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Also worth noting: Flock cameras and most other ALPRs operate at 840nm, which is perfect for purchasing IR LEDs at their operating wavelength, so you can hide them behind a license plate border to toggle on whenever you drive past one to wash out any details they could pickup.

    But a police officer would definitely be pulling you over and citing you if they catch that, so like, be sneaky or vigilant with its use.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A tip for you all when you need to damage small objects without getting caught:

    Make the best slingshot you can, train your aim and shooting strength, wait for a heavy rain day and shoot ice cubes at it. The rain will impair visibility and muffle the impact sounds, making it much harder to spot you, and there will be no evidence of what hit the object. Also, there’s nothing illegal about having a slingshot with you. The rain can make it harder to hit the object, but a few attempts will allow to learn compensate for it

    • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re right, but for something like a consumer laser pointer that’s typically rated in mW it makes sense to write 1000 mW and not 1 W.
      It makes clear how vastly different that is from the regular ones.

    • snoons@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      but that doesn’t sound as cool

      which also means anywhere that sells them would advertise it as 1000 [GOLDEN PRESENTERS VOICE WITH HIGH REVERB] mW and I feel a lot of people wouldn’t know the difference.

  • monotremata@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    A laser pointer is supposed to be limited to a maximum of 5mW, so these are really freaking powerful (200 times stronger). I don’t have experience with lasers that strong, because I value my eyesight, and that of my pets. Please learn more about lasers than I know before purchasing something like this.

    • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      A lot of the lazers from non reputable brands have are more powerful than rated, I think it was styropyro that has videos of it. But also a few sites sell 1w lasers and also it’s easy to make as well.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Aren’t the fools that do this going to end up on the optical camera part? My area is blanketed with these and the AI will apparently follow humans, not just cars.

    • snoons@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Afaict this is destroying the optical camera part, so as long an you’re not exposing your face or destroy it from outsido it’s fov one will be fine.

      Is it foolish to destroy surveillance devices installed by fascists?

      • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It might be impossible to destroy from outside the FOV because you inherently need to hit the sensor to damage it. Also a lot of them have a 360° view more than likely

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    To hit the sensor, you need to be in shot (by definition). Remember that walking patterns and other minutia can help identify you.

      • Manalith@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Try walking with a pebble in your shoe. That’ll change your gait and its not something you’re faking so it doesn’t require focus to maintain.

    • snoons@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, a big one for me is the distance between your eyes. I see so many people covering their face but not their eyes and the bridge of their nose.