PhenomenalPancake@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 months agoWho's in the wrong here?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageWho's in the wrong here?lemmy.worldPhenomenalPancake@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square12linkfedilink
minus-squareAkasazh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoGreens response could’ve meant (s)he had a busy day at work and was glad to put their feet up. The bluntness met have been unintended. Grey then exploded and made it a problem, showing that green actually dodged a bullet.
minus-squaremeekah@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoThat doesn’t make a lot of sense. The T could only be there when the S is also there. I think what you’re going for would look more like (s/t)he(y) Or maybe (s)(t)he(y)
minus-squareBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agoI mean it was a joke but yeah (s/t)he(y) works better
Greens response could’ve meant (s)he had a busy day at work and was glad to put their feet up. The bluntness met have been unintended.
Grey then exploded and made it a problem, showing that green actually dodged a bullet.
✨they✨
(s(t))he(y)
That doesn’t make a lot of sense. The T could only be there when the S is also there. I think what you’re going for would look more like
(s/t)he(y)
Or maybe
(s)(t)he(y)
I mean it was a joke but yeah (s/t)he(y) works better