• OR3X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 天前

    The people saying “just pay for premium” don’t seem to understand that in the beginning YouTube was free and had no ads. When google purchased it they promised to keep it that way. Then they slowly started with ads. At first they were pretty unobtrusive banners, then a short skippable preroll then multiple preroll then unskippable preroll. The reason I refuse to pay for premium is because Google created this issue and is now selling the solution. I refuse to be a part of that. It has nothing to do with the creators.

    • mlc894@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      I don’t think this is as simple as “they’re too young to know”! I’m a 30+ year old man, and I was around 15 when YouTube first came out. I was a huge fan of the early days, when YouTube was free!

      I am absolutely fine with paying a monthly/annual fee for ad-free access to perhaps the best compilation of human knowledge and entertainment which has ever been compiled in one place. One reason I’m cool with it is that premium views pay the content creator more than the equivalent ad view.

      Sure, YouTube “created the issue” of ads. But if it means supporting the creators and removing a barrier to videos, I’m fine with the price.

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 天前

      The people saying “just pay for premium” don’t seem to understand that in the beginning YouTube was free and had no ads were born after the 2008 housing crash

      Ftfy.

    • Pirate2377@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 天前

      The cost of hosting YouTube itself doesn’t pay for itself unfortunately. They could get away with it back then because the internet itself wasn’t that big. Therefore, we need to KICK THE NORMIES OUT OF OUR INTERNET. WE WERE HERE FIRST, REEEEEE

    • Pman@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 天前

      ReVanced and Grayjay do the same thing but for free and are open source so long as Google keeps trying to engineer enshitification the proud people of the open source community will engineer a solution.

      • r3plic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 天前

        Hmm weird take. Yes these are solutions to the Ad’s problem from the user side but they are just UI Wrapper for Youtube so they don’t have any costs for hosting & providing all the content. So yea they don’t need to monetize. This doesn’t however fix the problem for Youtube itself. How are they supposed to pay for cost & make a profit?

        I totally agree that Youtube with all the Ad’s is unusable (I’m using an AdBlocker) but Youtube is still a Profit orientated company so how do we fix this dilemma. Youtube Premium feels not worth it to most people because Youtube was always “free” so paying for it now makes people go like “WTF?”. So Ad’s & enshitification was/is the only way to make a profit for Youtube. I don’t like it either but this is reality.

        If you have a solution for them I’m sure they would pay you handsomely for it.

        • Pman@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 天前

          Peertube is a solution, it is an open source peet to peer video hosting platform. But in truth having good competition is a way to force better practices, and if open source is the best option people will go for it if they know about it. linux, thanks to valve and Microslop’s poor idea of what people want (and governments leery of Microsoft and Trump’s close association decoding to have their own OS for internal use at least), have gotten a small influx of users as a whole, but with more users the more open source solutions to compatibility will be produced, and hopefully if you are looking for the YouTube equivalent you’ll try peertube.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 天前

      I would totally pay for youtube if it was even remotely decently priced.

      You can get multiple concurrents on disney+, Hulu or Netflix with blockbuster content for the same price as youtube’s slop filled premium family.

      Seriously, the service is worth maybe $9 a month. I don’t want their music, i won’t use it, the quality is crap.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 天前

      I mean, as it grew the hosting/staffing costs went up as well. There’s no way it could have continued to be completely free.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 天前

            Yes, it is. Start by offering unsustainable ad-free video. Drive competitors out and monopolize the market. Start turning the screws. Classic tech bro bait and switch.

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 天前

              That’s really not what happened. YouTube wasn’t created to drive out competitors and monopolize the market.

              It may have ended up doing that, but a bait and switch is an intentional action.

              • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 天前

                But you yourself literally just argued the impossibility of it running ad free indefinitely. If you attract customers by knowingly offering a level of service at a cost you know with absolute certainty that you can’t maintain, then yes, it’s a bait and switch. It’s deception and manipulation. Classic bait and switch. Youtube isn’t special. They’re just Walmart.

                And you’re just wrong. There’s no other reason to offer a service temporarily for free than to use it to drive out competitors. That strategy only has any value as a means of driving out competition.

                But, sure, keep simping for the evil megacorp.

  • djdarren@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 天前

    With the glorious return of Tom Scott, I finally signed up to Nebula yesterday, and am pleasantly surprised at how many of my YT regulars are already on there. £30 for a year, no ads, and an Apple TV app.

    Which is £30 more than I paid YouTube, because the family plan is a ridiculous amount of money.

    • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 天前

      On desktop I get the “Video running slow? Disable your ad blocker” popup in a corner. But videos loaded normally.

      On mobile everything was fine until recently. In the last couple of weeks, videos do have a small lag before loading. Still preferable to ads. And I’m just using the browser’s in built blocker.

    • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 天前

      Yeah and they are pretty bad in terms of wording. It’s like „Try premium now for free“: „Yes“ or „Next time“

    • Logical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 天前

      I think it’s referring to the “you can’t block ads on YT or we might ban you” popups you get on YT occasionally, if you’re using an adblocker. I have only had it happen once or twice before I did a quick online search and found an extra filter or two to add to uBlock Origin, and then I stopped seeing them.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 天前

        I wonder how much time their devs spend working on a new ad block detector scheme that gets shown to a couple dozen people before ublock origin adds it to the default filters and none of their users see it again.

        I wonder if they get frustrated or just laugh and get back to the endless job. Or if they also write some of the ublock filters themselves.

        • Inucune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 天前

          This is a cold war happening in the background of the internet. If the advertising industry wins, everybody loses. Advertisement is intrusive by design.

  • solidheron@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 天前

    So is the scare screen when the UI flicker’s and I get a pop up saying “why you experiencing interruptions”?. I use brave browser

    I found that logging out solves it

  • FreeAlchemist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 天前

    I pay for it, and get YouTube Music with it. I think it’s worth it, and in the country I’m currently living, it’s inexpensive (~US$5 a month) 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • b0ber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 天前

    A big chunk of ad revenue goes to content creators, so you at least support them.

    • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 天前

      While this is technically true, this only works because of the scale. Each individual user contributes less than pennies.

      If you really want to support a creator, donate 5 dollars to them every year and you will be more valuable than any ad viewer.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 天前

        That’s just not true… When you have YouTube premium, you pay the creators you watch proportionally to your watch time of their content out of your subscription. You are giving them more of your money the more you watch that specific channel.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 天前

          A cap of 50% of your youtube premium goes to the creators.

          Small creators are given a pittance, large creators get the lions share, even with equal watch hours.

          • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 天前

            And even the pittance is more than 3x your AdSense view. As far as I’m concerned, premium is paying creators i watch while providing me with a more than serviceable music app and an ad free experience on both.

            • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 天前

              If you pay $14 for YTP and watched literally only one channel, ever, that channel could get up to a max of $7, less transaction fees. Alphabet eats the other $7. If you use uBlock and SponsorBlock, you get the same ad-free experience and can then control how the $14 gets distributed. I technically spend more than the cost of YTP each month on the creators I support, but I can see my contribution going directly to the creators in nearly the full allocated amounts. That’s a huge difference to small channels. Corporate lackeys will go ‘but the server costs!’ but Alphabet made ~$34B off of other people’s creations last quarter alone and have consistently made the user experience worse since they acquired YT, so any complaints from Alphabet’s C suite can be safely filed under BS.

              • r3plic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 天前

                I don’t disagree with your point but your data is not correct… Alphabet reported $34.46 billion in net income for Q4 2025 on total revenue of $113.8 billion. Ads generated $82.3 billion (72% of revenue):

                • Google Search ($63 billion)
                • YouTube ($11.4 billion)
                • Network ($7.8 billion)

                This is all REVENUE not Profit! Yes Alphabet made ~34B Profit that Quarter but not only from Youtube ad’s. I would assume a 25-30% margin on Youtube Max, so it’s more like ~4B Profit of Youtube Ad’s (Yes still a fuck ton of money).

        • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 天前

          I never mentioned premium, because yes it works like that for premium. But even for that paying them directly is better, as it avoids youtube’s cut completely.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 天前

      Yeah, of all the subscription services I don’t think YouTube is very egregious. The people you watch earn way more from you that way than watching ads.

      • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 天前

        I block all ads. Content creators earn more than I do by shilling for any company giving them 2 cents. They can fuck right off if they start crying about adblockers.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 天前

      Very well knowing why and watching them do their stalling is indeed fine.
      Every time you are reminded how petty they are.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      153
      ·
      8 天前

      Oh no! The video is black for a few seconds instead of showing several ads for a minute! Whatever am I going to do???

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        106
        ·
        8 天前

        Even if they keep the screen black for 30 second to a minute, I’d still gladly wait in silence than be subjected to advertisements.

        If they ever make it impossible to watch videos without first watching ads, then I’ll just leave the platform. I have no loyalty to YouTube and I’ll sooner dump the platform and move on to other video sites than deal with enshittification and ads.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          8 天前

          If they ever make it impossible to watch videos without first watching ads, then I’ll just leave the platform.

          Yep. Then it will be time to finally start exploring peertube or something…

            • IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              7 天前

              The problem isnt discovery its content. There isnt much good content on there. You’ll find the good stuff pretty quickly.

              • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                7 天前

                I take that personally :(

                Actually most of my videos are just boring things that I find interesting, and I get just as many views on there as I did on YouTube. And the autocaptions are waaaaaay better.

                What I like about peertube is it’s just people uploading for the love of it, not content farms and AI slop chasing a quick buck.

                Edit: oh yeah and not having multiple ads on my videos.

        • krisevol@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          8 天前

          But they offer an ad free plan that isn’t expensive, and the service is really fast and reliable, and comes with YouTube music as well. Why pay for streaming sites that still give you ads like amazon or peacock, but won’t pay for YouTube?

          • Vespair@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            7 天前

            Why pay for streaming sites that still give you ads like amazon or peacock

            I don’t? Anyone who pays for a service to show them ads is a rube?

            I would actually consider paying for a service like Youtube if it truly was as simple as that, but it isn’t. Even if they aren’t showing ads after your buy premium, they are still collecting, training on, and selling your data and habits. This is payment. I don’t believe in double-dipping; if I’m already paying in my data, then I’m not going to give you money or watch your ads.

            If you want to show ads without harvesting data or offer a way to pay monetarily that stops ads and data harvesting, then I’ll watch ads or buy. But I absolutely do no accept double-dipping. If I’m already paying, I’m not paying again.

          • cobysev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            8 天前

            I don’t pay for streaming sites. 🏴‍☠️ And I definitely won’t give YouTube any money. I’ve always been able to browse their videos without paying a cent. I’m not about to start now.

            Besides, I don’t like how everything has become subscription services nowadays. You used to be able to pay once and own a product. Now you need to pay monthly to have temporary access to a constantly changing library. No thanks, I’ll only spend money on things I can own forever.

            • krisevol@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              7 天前

              I love ad free music on my car, and no ads on my phone and pc, i and support company’s they allow my to get this service. You enjoy pricing every company is right to go to the ad models because people won’t pay for the ad free versions.

          • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            8 天前

            I just dont trust them not to use the payment and account info to track me more for every other ad they serve.

            They get nothing.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 天前

            I used to pay for YT.

            I quit because they were very anti-creator and i did not support the changes they were making.

          • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 天前

            Not expensive? I just checked. It’s 8€/m for me. Which means 96€/year.

            Maybe that’s not expensive for the USAians that earn hundreds of thousands per year. But it is expensive to just remove a few ads that can be easily blocked. It won’t even stop the Google tracking, it just stops the ads on YouTube. An ad blocker will also block the tracking.

          • chunes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 天前

            The way I see it, don’t make your thing free for 20 years if you want people to pay for it. At this point, it’s as natural and free as a summer’s breeze in our minds.

            • krisevol@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 天前

              It’s still free though. The paid version is just an ad free version. YouTube had always had ads for the free version.

          • recursivethinking@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 天前

            not OP but personally I watch maybe 2h of YT /month. Because I only watch one dude who posts about monthly, then the rest is just random links I’m clicking from a post or something. I donate to the guy periodically. The other links half of them are news clips or something that I could prob just get from their site.

            The one-size model just doesn’t fit my use case. I’d pay for a per-time-watched plan if it was reasonably priced but it doesn’t even exist.

            Honestly I could do without it entirely. Personally.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 天前

      I’m fine with waiting 10 seconds at the beginning of a video. I wonder how much YouTube would save (by reducing bandwidth, smaller caches, choosing slower storage) if they didn’t have the goal to start the video virtually immediately.

      • DragonOracleIX@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 天前

        That feature isn’t built into YT? I have it set on my browser to where the video needs to be manually started (excluding playlists).

        • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 天前

          My point was: You don’t need to wait for it to buffer or even load. Once the page is there, the video is playable.

    • pewpew@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 天前

      I don’t know why this just happens on my laptop. Probably it’s because it has a slower CPU. Also, this website shouldn’t be this bloated

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 天前

          You can tell they’re deliberately causing the delay by the way it pops up instantly and sends you to a page about turning off adblockers. The experiencing interruptions message used to send you to a page about ISP network performance…

    • djdarren@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 天前

      I was happy to pay for YT Premium when there was a loophole so you could sign up from a far cheaper country. I paid about £6 a month for the family plan, purely so I could watch on Apple TV without having to tolerate adverts.

      Then they closed the loophole, shitcanned our premium, and demanded £20 for the same experience. We had Netflix at the time, which was cheaper. So I made a little app as a frontend for yt-dlp, and downloaded what I wanted to watch into my Jellyfin server.

      Fuck Google.

    • Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      7 天前

      I’ll never understand why people are proud to waste their life watching ads. Or are proud to use adblock and steal the content being posted by small creators. You’re really sticking it to the little guy, great job.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 天前

      The best part is that Youtube ad revenue is low enough that everyone who can is doing their own sponsor segments, so paying for Youtube to remove their ads doesn’t remove a lot of the ads. The only way to an ad-free experience is adblock+sponsorblock.