Archive link: https://archive.ph/stHvt

Palantir CEO Alex Karp thinks his AI technology will lessen the power of “highly educated, often female voters, who vote mostly Democrat” while increasing the power of working-class men.

“This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”

This sounds like a direct, long-term pitch to the GOP from a CEO whose tech firm already has numerous government contracts and is deeply embedded in the Pentagon. Karp’s message is loud and clear: My technology will take political capital away from one of your greatest enemies—liberal women with degrees—and give one of your favorite demographics to patronize—working-class men—more political power to transfer to you. He’s aligning his technology with both GOP political strategy and the larger male-centered culture war that the right has been waging for the better part of a decade now. And how exactly would his technology only hurt Democrat women?

Karp also made a Patriot Act–era argument, justifying his admittedly “dangerous” technology by claiming that Palantir will allow us to “be American” in the future.

“These technologies are dangerous societally,” Karp continued. “The only justification you could possibly have would be that if we don’t do it, our adversaries will do it. And we will be subject to their rule of law.… Why is it that we’re absorbing the risk of disrupting the very fabric of our society, including the most powerful parts of our society, if it’s not because it’s about maintaining our ability to be American in the near term and long term?”

  • big_spoon@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    a capitalist who named his magnum opus as an evil device from a tale, gives an explanation of his weird idea of a master evil plan to defeat the “evul feminazis”…for some reason people like this worm can gather lots of money from cognitive impaired rightoids and governments

  • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    And yet, 39% of DCCC funding comes from Palantir; I guess taking money from AIPAC has grown too toxic. The Democratic Likud Party is the same as the Republican AfD Party under the hood.

    • Maeve @lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      AIPAC donates through other PACs now, I forget names. If a comrade can help a sister out…

  • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    He’s just more honest about doing away the bourgoisie theater of electoralism and lay bare more nakedly the fascism underpinning the West.

  • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    this technology

    my technology

    AI technology

    Mr journalist was so engrossed in scaremongering he forgot to tell us what we were talking about

  • Rogelio_Marciano@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can AI teach, care for the sick and elderly, etc.? No. Then how does it take away power from women in strongly feminized sectors? I see his fash logic but ultimately its a pipe dream. Useful to lure in gorillions of dollars though.

  • Greyscale
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think we should render Karp into soup. Then I wouldn’t have to hear him talk bollocks. A great improvement,

      • Greyscale
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        well, previously I was banned from Reddit for saying Peter Thiel should be turned to soup. So theres that aspect of my findings.