• Elting@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    A claw hammer would be a better option than a gun. Why does everyone assume that a gun would be the best thing to defend yourself with in all situations.

    • Wakmrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Ok you bring a claw hammer and I’ll bring a rifle we’ll test your theory out

          • Elting@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            I can grab it at a moments notice as it can safely be left out, you don’t have to load it or aim it so using it is fast and simple. If its my home they’re invading I know where to hide. I trust my ability to swing and hit someone in a panic far more than I do my ability to handle a gun under the same pressure. Its just going to be easier and more reliable to hit someones head with a hammer than it will be to shoot them.

            • butwhyishischinabook@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Unlike you, I actually train with my gun so we have very different concerns when under pressure. Mine relate more to not getting killed to make some kind of moral stand about how guns are bad in all contexts.

              • Elting@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 days ago

                Brother I aint said shit about how I feel about gun ownership, you read into that. I’m just pointing out that I really do think a claw hammer is just an overall more utilitarian self defense weapon.

                • butwhyishischinabook@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Okay fair enough. I would agree it’s definitely better than something unwieldy like an AR, but personally I’d rather have a handgun than a hammer. If someone’s breaking into my house and actively snooping around such that simply hiding and waiting for them to leave isn’t going to keep me safe, then there’s an above normal (but probably not strictly likely) chance that they’re on some kind of stimulant. A hammer may or may not put them down. A few hollow points tearing through their chest cavity probably will. Hammer definitely isn’t bad, but I personally think the odds are stronger with a handgun.

            • OwOarchist@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 days ago

              it can safely be left out

              Honestly, I wouldn’t leave hammers lying around where kids could get to them any more than guns. The hammer will be less deadly, sure, but a dumb kid will still cause a lot of damage with it.

              you don’t have to load it

              True

              or aim it

              False, lol. You out there protecting yourself with unaimed hammer swings?

              I trust my ability to swing and hit someone in a panic far more than I do my ability to handle a gun under the same pressure.

              Skill issue. Requires training time.

            • cattywampas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              The only advantage I agree with is the ability to leave a hammer out versus a gun, and that’s only in cases of having small children at home. If your gun is for self-defense, it would make more sense to keep it loaded and easily accessible.

              I have to say it’s a very strange stance to prefer to defend yourself within arm’s reach of an assailant versus at a distance. I think you’re also giving yourself a lot of credit when you say you’d be more confident swinging a hammer with enough accuracy and strength to incapacitate someone while panicking. Better hope you get them in one swing.

              • Elting@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Maybe its just because I’ve been in a lot of dog fights, but if someone close to you swings something heavy, i think most people would drop the gun to try stopping it. However it is sooo situational.

                • OwOarchist@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  but if someone close to you swings something heavy, i think most people would drop the gun to try stopping it

                  Pro tip: If you have a gun, it’s also something heavy you can swing at people, if you for some reason think that’s a superior tactic.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Unless you’re fighting nails, a claw hammer is not not the best thing to defend yourself with in any situation.