• Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    We already have a shitty controlling surveillance state government here that shits all over the freedoms of people, no need for another one.

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      One has a 90% approval rating and the other is trafficking kids and committing genocide

      • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Oh yeah man people all over the world talk about their 90% approval rate. And no genocides to speak of historically no sir-right?

        The rest though, yeah you’re correct about.

        But is like saying “look man if you stopped using heroin you could switch to crack and have more energy throughout the day!”

        Seems like there’s another solution or two that doesn’t involve either one.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean if we’re gonna have one. I’d take the one with the high speed rail lines.

    • ski11erboi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      But on that same note if both are surveillance states at least we could be governed by one that isn’t hell bent on bombing the world. And trains. We could have trains.