• chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Always thought friendzone was when one person was exploiting the power differential caused by non-reciprocated romantic feelings and calling it a “friendship” when it’s really an abusive sort of relationship.

    If someone has unrequited feelings for you and is struggling to get over it then you need to be clear with your rejection of them and give them space to get over it. If they reject your rejection then they are being problematic. But if you can’t give them space then you are being selfish.

    Romantic rejection involves a grieving process and it’s normal to need space to go through it. If the person who rejects you can’t give you that space you need then they are not your friend.

    • nomad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Thank you for this take. You put into words what I felt going into this comment section.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      It blows my mind that slut is still used as an attack on women. My family and my circle of friends have used the term playfully amongst each other, but as I got older and more involved in politics and realized that, no, there are people who legitimately believe in this myth that sluttiness is somehow immoral or stains a woman, that blew my fucking mind.

      I mean, my parents weren’t exactly labeling themselves sex positive, but had I ever suggested that a woman was somehow stained or immoral or whatever else these people associate with “sluts,” my mama would have whooped my ass from here to a feminist bookstore.

      Seriously, sex is fun. It’s fucking great. It’s exercise, it releases the fun chemicals, it’s a way to bond if you want to be bond, it’s a way to pass an evening in a new town if that’s all you’re in it for. Use protection, make sure you’re not bringing a murderer home, and go have fun.

      • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Are you the gender police? Wee woo wee woo wee woo. Am I under arrest for gender crimes? Do I need to show you what’s in my underwear?

        • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’ll take that as a no. In which case your opinion on the word not being an issue is as irrelevant as you are not the aggrieved party.

            • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              The complete refusal to answer the question and the prior attempt to make slut not a slur is obvious enough that they’re some hetero white male who has never suffered discrimination before.

              • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Assumed my gender and my race, what a treat you are. You kind of come across like a close-minded slut-shaming bigot who denies others the right to form their own gender identity, but I guess I deserve it because I didn’t show you my papers.

    • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I love that slut is being reclaimed.

      But a word can be both partially reclaimed and deeply insulting depending on who uses it and the context of its use. See the N-word.

  • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Exactly!

    “Guys” is gender exclusion.

    “Nagging” is shaming women for asking someone to do what they committed to do.

    “Pussy” is gender bias that women are weak.

    It’s all bullshit.

    For those who defend the use of any of these because we know what they mean, stop being a little shit. Just change! It’s not that hard.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Idk, I’m not sure it’s really that deep in most modern vernacular. Out of all social issues, being critical of people using slang like this who don’t intentionally mean it to be gender exclusive or biased is a choice you can make. I just think there’s bigger issues facing women than “guys” and “pussy” slang.

      • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It might not be the most pressing issue, but it is one of the ones we have the most direct control over changing. And it’s fucking easy to do.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          What I mean is that the vast majority of people using that slang in modern times aren’t associating it in the way you’re implying. The words virtually have no meaning in those contexts other than, guys = general term for any person present / pussy = being a coward. I get the root of it being sexist, but changing decades of slang when it isn’t actually that insulting is how we annoyed everyone. Marc Maron’s Panicked special covers this topic pretty well, I feel.

          • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            There’s plenty of people that find masculine default language insulting. I don’t expect people to change how they talk in general; but I find it wild how many people absolutely lose their shit over “Oh, please don’t include me in ‘you guys’.” or “Please don’t use man/dude/bro on me.”

      • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think anyone making meaningful efforts with material results in those areas probably gets a pass. For everyone else what’s their excuse?

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      Betty White had a great take on “Pussy” forgive me not remembering it correctly, but she joked more than once that it’s strange to use that word to call someone weak, those things take a pounding and usually, ask for more!

      • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        I totally agree with her! Call someone balls or scrotum or something. As someone who’s old enough to have sat on one once, those fucking things are weak sauce! 😭😭😭

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          I do think calling someone a “scrotum” is an insult, but not one that implies being weak.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve always understood pussy (as in afraid, not the vagina meaning) to be related to cats?

      I love the “I call everyone dude” shtick being responded with “So you fuck dudes?”. Shuts those type up pretty quickly.

    • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Nagging doesn’t always have to do with commitment.

      Hypothetically speaking, if I asked you for a cigarette every 15 seconds that would be considered nagging.

  • pfr@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’d also argue that “Slut” is also shaming a woman for her right to say NO because, generally, the person calling any woman a slut is probably an incel type who is not getting any. I imagine that men who have regular sex will rarely use the term.

    • DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      There’s a bunch that kind of self identify that way and it’s more like an actual set form of indoctrination with it’s own verbage, philosophy and cultural norms? I feel like it’s more like a subculture that occasionally gets misapplied - like calling that one guy you know who always wears black t-shirts and jeans “goth” rather than something that’s “slut” or “bitch” level of ubiquitous .