• ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It has benefits like being more oxygen resistant and with this having more often a clean touch with the device you plug it into.

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      That is true, but what a lot of people miss is the next part. Gold covered cables were better, before we created modern alloys. Now that cheap cable with a copper connector will tarnish slower than the gold cable.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Gold is non reactive. Gold plating still makes sense for analog cables, but not with digital ones.

        With digital, the receiver is able to filter out the noise that a dirty connection might have. It will either work or not and it takes a long time for a moderately well made cable to get dirty enough with regular use to fail.

        The meme should have been those 2k diamond hdmi cables or even the monster brand ones.

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Fool! Those cables aren’t even shielded from electromagnetic radiation! I can literally hear the cosmic background noise of the universe it’s so bad.

    • JC1@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You laugh, but I once had a Future Shop employee try to sell me an expensive toslink cable by saying it had electromagnetic shielding. I replied that it’s light, for him to say that emp affect light. I laughed in his face, leaving with the cheap one.

    • this@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      As an audio engineer I can confirm that shielding is more important in a cable than weather or not it has gold plated connectors. Gold plated connectors don’t really do much unless the connectors are worn down and don’t make good contact in the first place, shielding actually does something for signal to noise ratio, especially for unbalanced and/or mic level(low level signal) and/or long cables. This is really only applicable for analog stuff for the most part of course.

      • ClassyHatter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not an audio engineer, but I had unshielded (thin) cables in my home speaker setup. If the cables were positioned correctly, everything was fine. Accidentally move them even a little, and there’d be a huge amount of noise, due to power cables going near the speaker cables. Switched to shielded (thick) cables, and there’s no noise ever.

  • redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Gold analog cables is certainly better than their cheaper counterpart because the connector is less likely to corrode and would maintain perfect contact after repeated connect/disconnect cycles. Gold HDMI cables however is complete scam.

    • liktwo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The thing is: For most people and situations cables never corrode so badly that somebody would hear any difference.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Especially gold plated like in the meme. Solid gold isn’t really worth it, but gold plated means a thin layer of gold at the point of contact. Less corrosion at the point of contact, a better electrical connection, fewer sound issues.

      The problem is when they start selling digital cables that cost 10x as much and use exotic materials. First of all, digital has error compensation built into the protocols so even if one bit gets flipped occasionally, the numbers still add up and exactly the same data gets through. Second, as long as the cable follows the standard (say HDMI) even the cheapest cable will be indistinguishable from a really expensive one.

      • Venutian Spring@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Had a buddy of mine that swore they were a game changer. Ended up spending hundreds or dollars replacing all of his audio cables and couldn’t tell a difference

  • TheInsane42@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Nah, you need carbon cables… As anlog interlink, no change what so ever, as digital interlinks the bass seems smoother. (can’t even think of a theory that fits there, but I’ll take it)