deleted by creator
They sure did. It all started when democrats wanted to play fair, and then lost out on opportunity when republicans went nuclear. I hate how it has to be that way, but us democrats need to be aggressive and not passive anymore. No more fucking around.
Excellent point…
Butter my buttcheeks.
You are welcome, feel free to butter whenever
Do we have an equivalent of RimjobSteve yet?
absolutely
When they go low, kick them in the fucking teeth.
deleted by creator
Also allowed; ‘No Christians’ and ‘no MAGA traitors’ - people need to teach these asshats their legalised discrimination works in both ways.
Gay and Jewish people won’t bomb your business.
MAGA terrorists might.
Removed by mod
Trans people actually severely, severely underrepresented in mass shooting aggressors. Should’ve been at least 3x as many to match their frequency in the general population.
You fucking piece of shit bigot.
Removed by mod
Are you really blaming trans people for all mass shootings because one nonbinary person was a shooter in one event?
deleted by creator
Your claim about Major Questions Doctrine does not appear to be accurate.
Now that SCOTUS has allowed it, expect “no Jews allowed” signs to start popping up.
After the Citizens United ruling deciding that money is speech, it’s clear that bribery is the most compelling legal argument.
More like the Christian WRONG.
It’s odd that the author thinks Republicans put aside their differences and backed Republicans no matter what, while Democrats were seen as stiff and ideology-obsessed and cancelled their own. Republicans generally cancelled anyone who didn’t match 100% of the party line, and 2020-2022 felt like the Democrats put aside their dislike of Biden and instead went with “vote blue no matter who.”
Otherwise, great piece.
deleted by creator
The Supreme Court is simply following the Constitution, as it should. It’s refreshing to see.
I disagree with the use of “Christian Right” in the headline. This isn’t really about religion. These positions have been GOP positions for a long time.
Affirmative action itself was racist by definition, because it discriminated solely based on skin color. It needed to go. There are problems with certain minorities making it into higher education, but that can be solved by changing how taxes are distributed to schools, not by letting unqualified people into college programs.
Student loan forgiveness was a joke from the start. If you didn’t want to pay back the loans, you shouldn’t have taken them. If the issue is the cost of higher education, then we should focus on passing legislation restricting the amount that can be charged for college tuition.
Regarding the cake issue, you can’t compel speech, and last I checked, art was considered speech. So, decorating a cake in a specific way is speech that can’t be compelled. This isn’t 1850. There’s more than one baker in town. If you don’t like the policies of a particular bakery, go to the next one. The hyperbolic responses about “No Jews allowed” is ridiculous, because that would be religious discrimination, which is a separate issue. Also, it seems a little wild to accuse the Christian Right of not supporting Jews (Israel).
Have you been residing on a different planet for the last few decades?