Every fucking post with you nuts it’s just nipples, if it was a man you wouldn’t complain. You probably would not complain about naked baby Jesus penis. Honestly I can’t wait for the a.i. apocalypse or climate disaster please hurry.
Is it okay in your workplace? I have no personal problem with the painting, but it should be marked not safe for work if unintentionally viewing it at work could cause a problem.
No, hard disagree, but, like, being precious about this shit us frustrating to me as well. The even circumstantial censorship of art for corporate droning reasons is disturbing to me.
Counter argument: a lot of what we now think of as fine art, used to basically be porn. Old rich pervy men or the clergy having an ogle at young women, pretending to be fancy and holier than thou.
If this was a photograph, plenty of people would consider it more NSFW.
This one’s not too bad, but it’s arguably creepy when the women in these kinds of painting look younger. John William Waterhouse’s Hylas and the Nymphs, for example.
I mean, it’s a bit weird that it’s ok to have Paul Gaugain nude’s on the wall. Beautiful and important paintings, but invariably they’re paintings of the underage girls he raped.
I was kinda making fun of all the nsfw losers, I hope their children enjoy the social credit system looming in the near future. I would hate to piss off some corporate Karen/s
I have encouraged surgeons to ‘make sure you have fun with it’ when operating on me. I will be sorely disappointed if none of them took the time to engrave crude genitalia or a really dumb joke on any of my limbs.
I understand that this is art not porn, but marking nsfw would be appreciated
Printing it out and putting it on the wall of your workplace would also be appreciated. Don’t be a coward
Every fucking post with you nuts it’s just nipples, if it was a man you wouldn’t complain. You probably would not complain about naked baby Jesus penis. Honestly I can’t wait for the a.i. apocalypse or climate disaster please hurry.
Is it okay in your workplace? I have no personal problem with the painting, but it should be marked not safe for work if unintentionally viewing it at work could cause a problem.
You should be working at work not slacking off, your boss should fire you regardless if it’s nsfw because it’s non work related.
No, hard disagree, but, like, being precious about this shit us frustrating to me as well. The even circumstantial censorship of art for corporate droning reasons is disturbing to me.
Counter argument: a lot of what we now think of as fine art, used to basically be porn. Old rich pervy men or the clergy having an ogle at young women, pretending to be fancy and holier than thou.
If this was a photograph, plenty of people would consider it more NSFW.
This one’s not too bad, but it’s arguably creepy when the women in these kinds of painting look younger. John William Waterhouse’s Hylas and the Nymphs, for example.
I mean, it’s a bit weird that it’s ok to have Paul Gaugain nude’s on the wall. Beautiful and important paintings, but invariably they’re paintings of the underage girls he raped.
Did I say fine art, or art?
And I know I said
So maybe you’re responding to the wrong comment? Doesn’t seem to relate to anything I was saying.
I was kinda making fun of all the nsfw losers, I hope their children enjoy the social credit system looming in the near future. I would hate to piss off some corporate Karen/s
I just disagree with anyone saying not to fuck around at work.
Be sure to explain that to your surgeon.
I have encouraged surgeons to ‘make sure you have fun with it’ when operating on me. I will be sorely disappointed if none of them took the time to engrave crude genitalia or a really dumb joke on any of my limbs.