• Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I appreciate that they linked to the actual transportation agenda, but when you look at the article and agenda side-by-side, it becomes really obvious how dishonest NY Post is being here

    NY Post is outright lying about parks in the middle of streets. I get their biases, but shouldn’t they at least pretend to be honest?

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    War on Drivers

    Dogshit title.

    Its a war on the automotive industry and their planet killing infrastructure that’s forced millions of Americans to own cars they can’t even afford to get to jobs late that don’t even adequately compensate them.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh yes, that planet-killing infrastructure that allows your groceries to be delivered to your store.

      Let me guess, your ideal future for humanity is ultra-densified condo towers with thousands of identical 250 sqft cubicles so we can all huddle together and bike to service jobs that don’t even let you see a lawn for the rest of your life?

      Would it also include 10+ billion people by 2050 Mr Planet Killer?

      • NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Non car transportation exists, trains will get your goods to the store but vastly more efficiently. But you’re probably baiting anyway you car brained hyper individualist dweeb

        • dan69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’d love to see barts from the north end to the sound in my city. We have major streets that don’t need cars parked on it.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          you car brained hyper individualist dweeb

          It’s really got nothing to do with individualism.

          And meanwhile, some European cities are implementing zero-emission zones for logistics (trucking and deliveries). It’s not all rail.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Let me guess, your ideal future for humanity is ultra-densified condo towers with thousands of identical 250 sqft cubicles so we can all huddle together and bike to service jobs that don’t even let you see a lawn for the rest of your life?

        You’ve guessed wrong. I’m living in a (by US standards) high-density small European city right now. 95% of the time, everything I need is within walking or cycling distance. Public transport works well for the remainder. I’m living in a 1500-square-foot house, as are most of my neighbors. There’s grass and trees outside, and a river. Neighbor kids are playing outside. I don’t work in a service job. So go ahead and have your shit hemorrhage if you want, but if you ever become interested in facts, come and see how real people are living right now.

        Would it also include 10+ billion people by 2050 Mr Planet Killer?

        That’s an unrelated problem. Only a fool assumes that there’s only a single workable solution. And only a worse fool assumes that the existing arrangement is the only possible one.

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    Goodness, this article was a pain to read. Every single point raised is easily refutable but there’s one particular paragraph I wanted to pick apart:

    Among the plan’s more than 80 demands is a bizarre proposal to build playgrounds smack in the middle of city streets that would then be redesigned into cul-de-sacs — a move the group claims will solve the city’s “playground desert problem.”

    Imagine calling a plan to build more playgrounds - something that would provide a long-term benefit for children- “bizarre” just because it just might remove some streets? I don’t want come off as employing the overused “think of the children” argument since it’s used to justify censorship but children do, in fact, have a right to clean spaces with breathable, unpolluted air.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re trying to claim the playgrounds will be in the middle of the street. They even post a picture of an obviously poorly designed playground in between streets to associate the two ideas

      This is despite the fact the whole point of closing low traffic streets to make a playground and cul de sac is so we don’t have to put a playground in a literal street

      It’s propaganda, plain and simple

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      This COMMUNIST thinks building PLAYGROUNDS will solve the LACK OF PLAYGROUNDS?! Gadzooks, what fooferaw! Communists are so silly! Let the free market provide playgrounds.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Goodness, this article was a pain to read.

      The NY Post is cancer. Anyone who works there should seriously reconsider their life choices.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      it is funny how low they are willing to go, not even journalistic integrity is stopping them anymore. should have the name of the writer out there and his twitter account so they can be shamed on public. If this is an actual person and not fake name or AI.

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Opening lines of the article:

    Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani could make driving in the Big Apple hell on wheels

    Oh fucking please. NYC has always been a shit-show to drive in. If they would improve the mass transit options, i would never choose to drive in.

      • FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well the NYPost is literally owned by Rupert Murdoch. (Trump’s billionaire buddy who owns Fox News and half the Australian media).

        So this is par for the course I’m afraid.

  • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 days ago

    New York is going to get the same media coverage as Paris did. Paris got so much better in the last 15 years it’s absolutely crazy.

    • Garbagio@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Really? How so? I’ve wanted to visit for decades; I haven’t been scared, just poor 😅

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        Paris did the same thing Mamdani wants to do in NYC: Turn roads into green spaces and pedestrian paths/bikeways and make it much easier to get around without a car. While the people there were at first unsure about it and complained, they’ve been really happy with it now that it’s proven itself to be beneficial. The air is cleaner, and the streets are safer and far less congested. It’s totally transformed Paris.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Good news: its going to become much more affordable soon. Rent freezes, free busses, $30 minimum wage…

  • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Conservatives always make leftists sound cooler than they really are lol.

    In fact, I took one of my taglines from Trump’s anti-trans executive order, “An Anti American Ideology”. I’m a trans performer

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    FWIW I don’t actually hate cars. It’s just hate angry drivers, pollution, danger to everybody from pedestrian to other drivers, noise, economical dependence, power imbalance, etc. The cars themselves are…

    OK forget that, I’m a car hater too.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    4 days ago

    That New York Post article is a hate-filled piece of garbage.

    For example, it hates against these “polarizing rat-riddled street dining shacks” (quote is from the article).

    I can guarantee you, i live in Vienna, we have these things all over the place. There’s at least 5 of them on my way from where i live to university. There’s never been any problems with them. In fact, they’re delicious and typically much cheaper than sit-in restaurants. That’s probably because they don’t have to pay for expensive rooms. That makes the food much cheaper, it’s typically around 5€ for a kebab (basically a sandwich) compared to 12€ for anything you get at a sit-in restaurant. I have gone to these street dining shacks every day for years and never had problems.

    • GenderNeutralBro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Is that picture real? It looks like it should be a KenM post, talking about the very normal-looking restaurant shack instead of the prominent pile of un-binned garbage.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      It would be better to give the businesses and landlords some certainty and allow them to be built as a permanent structure. Add better trash holding infrastructure while they are at it.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nah, these are part of whatever restaurant is across the sidewalk. That does sound nice, but hasn’t been my experience with them. I haven’t eaten at all of them though, that’s for sure.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      None of those were freestanding food places, they were simply an outside dining area for places that already had inside dining areas that nobody wanted to uses during Covid. Those little seating booths were necessary during Covid, when nobody wanted to be trapped in sealed rooms with other strangers, but their usefulness has passed, and we are left with the problems.

      For one thing, they took away parking spaces, which are already extremely scarce. Secondly, because they are slightly raised, they made for a perfectly safe little living space for vermin under the floorboards. Thirdly, none of them were built with any kind of permits or regulations, and they were getting run down and poorly maintained, and that was only going to get worse. Finally, they’re only useable for only about half the year anyway.

      They were kind of neat during Covid, when everyone was trying anything they could to keep their businesses operating, and the government was willing to look the other way for a change, but those times have passed, and these things have become more trouble than they’re worth any more.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        For one thing, they took away parking spaces, which are already extremely scarce.

        Parking spaces should be scarce in NYC.

        Secondly, because they are slightly raised, they made for a perfectly safe little living space for vermin under the floorboards

        Lol, are you seriously trying to blame NYC’s rat problem on these? The problem has more to do with the large piles of garbage sitting on the street.

        Thirdly, none of them were built with any kind of permits or regulations

        Ooooh noooo, an unpermitted shed, noooo 😭

        Land in a city should be put to its highest and best use. Are these little seating areas the highest and best use? Maybe, maybe not. But the highest and best use definitely isn’t parked cars.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    One of the many stupid things about it is that generally speaking, most measures to reduce cars have the effect of making car travel more pleasant. It’s building tons of extra lanes that drives its own demand and makes driving slow and unpleasant.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      You need to remember that the groups that push for this pro-car culture don’t represent the drivers, but the manufacturers.

      They don’t care about the actual experience of driving - they only want to shit out as many new vehicles onto the road as possible.

  • olympicyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    The first time I went to NYC, car traffic was still allowed on Broadway between 46th and 47th in Times Square. Closing it off gave all these tourists somewhere to go and made crossing the street so much safer. It’s crazy to me that so much real estate was ceded to making the area 5% more convenient for drivers when the land was so much better used for pedestrians. NYC is already so walkable but I’d love to see it even less congested. No reason not to use the bus.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ban cars throughout the entire city. Delivery vehicles at night time only. Let the rich return to the ancient ways. To separate themselves from the rabble, they’ll be carried around in sedan chairs like the rich fat bastards of yore.