I have always been fond of music, especially when I’m feeling down. Now, I don’t think there’s enough popular songs about disability and how we struggle each day. But I stumbled across a song the other day that, while it’s not about disability, I’ve been listening to quite often when I feel like I failed somehow. When all that’s happening is really just me struggling and making it through another day, for better or for worse, I like to remind myself that I am perfectly incomplete, but I am good the way I am. I hope that maybe it helps you too.


Friendly reminder to please use

spoiler tags and content warnings [cw]

Hexbear CoC

for sensitive content that falls under Hexbear’s Code of Conduct. You can find the spoiler tag here:

After clicking it, just substitute the second “spoiler” with your content warning and the three underscores ( ___ ) with your sensitive content, and you’re all done.


As always, we ask that in order to participate in the weekly megathread, one self-identifies as some form of disabled, which is broadly defined in the community sidebar:

“Disability” is an umbrella term which encompasses physical disabilities, emotional/psychiatric disabilities, neurodivergence, intellectual/developmental disabilities, sensory disabilities, invisible disabilities, and more. You do not have to have an official diagnosis to consider yourself disabled.

Mask up, love one another, and stay alive for one more week.

  • Salah [ey/em]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    It would be very helpful if there was an explanation included for the mechanism that makes usage of the mentioned words ableist. I can not give a better explanation to this but a very simplified example would be:

    Using the phrase ‘blinded by’ normalises the idea that blindness is a bad thing that should be avoided. Blind people should have the agency over the connotation of the word ‘blindness’ and not be influenced by our negative usage of it to think that their condition is inherently bad.

    It would be cool if there was an academic source on this mechanism.

    It’s a lot to ask of any community to spell out exactly why certain things are bad for them, but unfortunately it is often the only way to get people to actually consider what you’re asking of them.

    • gingerbrat [she/her]@hexbear.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’ll try to find an academic source tomorrow if I can, otherwise I think your two sentences are good additions that I’ve put into the document. Thank you very much for your input!

    • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Using the phrase ‘blinded by’ normalises the idea that blindness is a bad thing that should be avoided. Blind people should have the agency over the connotation of the word ‘blindness’ and not be influenced by our negative usage of it to think that their condition is inherently bad.

      this is quite strange to me, all sighted people are temporarily blinded on a regular basis and often in physically unpleasant ways that we avoid when possible.

      • gingerbrat [she/her]@hexbear.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        I think maybe we need to switch out “blinded by” with the example in the document “You’d have to be blind not to see it”, as we explained that “blinded by” is something that can be non-ableist in context, while the second example can’t be. Would that make it more understandable?