Editing to delete all of this. I am getting real threats again, and I am not willing to have a complete mental collapse over fucking Lemmy for a 2nd time. Fuck this place. And especially fuck all of the transpose assholes bent on making my life hell. I am deleting my accounts permanently, but will leave the content up. Don’t worry, you won’t need to kill or doxx me, I intend to take care of the former myself.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    proof that it is high time that an instance needs the ability to straight up perma ban a username

    This wouldn’t solve the problem. They’d just roll in with cm0003. You need an IP ban or some similar source specific censorship. Even then, it’s a moving target when the end user is determined enough.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yep, there’s at least two different people who are playing this sockpuppet game already. One went by, among other names, lucky8 and would only post think-tank political articles across dozens of communities - an actual propaganda account. Another appears to just repost reddit content onto Lemmy, they had a name similar to darnelle until they started picking other names.

      These accounts stand out a lot more whenever you take a look at a specific-purpose instance like a country or subculture instance, rather than a large general-purpose instance like yours or mine. A lot of people complain because these sockpuppets flood an instance with propaganda or just off-topic junk.

    • green_copper@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      You need an IP ban or some similar source specific censorship

      CG NAT and VPNs want to have a word with you.

      • CanadaPlus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        OP did say:

        Even then, it’s a moving target when the end user is determined enough.

        • green_copper@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          This doesn’t need much determination. And especially with CG NAT you would IP ban not only one person, but a whole block or even district of persons.

          • CanadaPlus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Most trolls don’t even know what those are, though. And in my experience, making an account somewhere else is more effort than 99.9% put in already.

              • CanadaPlus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                What’s the point? OP mentioned that there’s still ways around an IP ban in theory. They’re still widely used to great effect in practice.

                • Anivia@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The point he is trying to make is that an IP ban can also affect innocent users in the crossfire, if they share the same IP. For example because of CGNAT

                  • CanadaPlus
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Oh. Well if so, that’s true. Although if you’re not going by whole blocks the effect is limited, and can be solved by any kind of appeal process. I’m guessing most unfair bans are intentional.