title
The what? Who?
AntiX is explicitly antifascist. So that should probably be on the good list.
I’d like AntiX a lot more if they weren’t so anti systemd
With so many distributions which only support systemd, that is actually a good thing
I’m inclined to agree with Rain. I use systemd on my daily driver, but it’s nice that there are options.
Debian for sure.
antiX, the openly antifacist distro. its based on debian
Red Star OS for sure
I really hope none of you comrades are actually using that… I hear AntiX is good, Debian stays out of overt politics, and there’s at least a few other AES states with a State Distro that’s much easier to get your hands on the latest point release of, if you really must use an Official State Distro from an ideologically ML state.
The red star OS that people know about is like a 20 year old version that was leaked.
They just use Debian if they don’t use windows or macs.
Never used it lol, don’t imagine many people do in the west
Came here to say this
Maybe HarmonyOS. The synthesis is Bazzite which is made by woke liberals. Bazzite is also mostly shell scripts but they run on other peoples’ computers and there’s actually a benefit to using it (immutability) which is more woke.
Bazzite folks are lib, but at least they actually innovate.
Omarchy is an edgy “ricer” toy that a Nazi shared to get all his Nazi friends to join in on.
Yes, that’s the long and short of it.
It’s Debian.
Doesn’t need Wayland, doesn’t need the newest bullshit, has a complex system of voting and committee decision making.
I’d say one of the gay leftist nixos forks (aux.computer) or guix.
There is also https://lix.systems/ which is also led by the woke mob terrorizing nixos and its logo uses lesbian pride colors.
Looking forward to lixpkgs
Deliciously anticipating.
debian
DFSG was adopted in 1997.
The Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG)
-
Free Redistribution
The license of a Debian component may not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license may not require a royalty or other fee for such sale. -
Source Code
The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in source code as well as compiled form. -
Derived Works
The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software. -
Integrity of The Author’s Source Code
The license may restrict source-code from being distributed in modified form only if the license allows the distribution of “patch files” with the source code for the purpose of modifying the program at build time. The license must explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source code. The license may require derived works to carry a different name or version number from the original software. (This is a compromise. The Debian group encourages all authors not to restrict any files, source or binary, from being modified.) -
No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups
The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons. -
No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research. -
Distribution of License
The rights attached to the program must apply to all to whom the program is redistributed without the need for execution of an additional license by those parties. -
License Must Not Be Specific to Debian
The rights attached to the program must not depend on the program’s being part of a Debian system. If the program is extracted from Debian and used or distributed without Debian but otherwise within the terms of the program’s license, all parties to whom the program is redistributed should have the same rights as those that are granted in conjunction with the Debian system. -
License Must Not Contaminate Other Software
The license must not place restrictions on other software that is distributed along with the licensed software. For example, the license must not insist that all other programs distributed on the same medium must be free software. -
Example Licenses
The “GPL”, “BSD”, and “Artistic” licenses are examples of licenses that we consider “free”.
-
GNOME is not a distro obviously, but the community is very inclusive. Fedora is historically “the” GNOME distro, so I guess that? It’s what I use
I have some bad news for you about Red Hat…
The elementary dev is very cool, but I just personally don’t love the macos like window management :/
It’s nice that they have a CoC that tells the participants not to be racist, sexist and ableist instead of a CoC that tells the participants not to be rude to MIC goons.
Why is Omarchy Nazi? I’m not familiar with it.
Omarchy is a psyop to launder the reputation of Its creator DHH and also uses shitty components and tools (super groKKK on command)
Its creator is a bit of a Nazi.
I wasn’t either until I downloaded Omarchy. I’ve been tinkering with Arch for a while now but wasn’t familiar with the lore and politics.
I use arch btw
