Everyone in the corporate press is framing China’s rare earth controls as just another trade war escalation. They’re missing the point entirely, probably on purpose. China is directly dismantling the US war machine’s supply chain.

The US has been burning through its weapons stockpiles in proxy wars for years. Now, just as the Pentagon desperately needs to rebuild, China moves to restrict the very materials needed to make advanced weapons like F-35 jets, missiles, drones, you name it. China controls over 90% of the global supply for this stuff, and restricting output is a strategic move to defang the imperial core.

And the beautiful part is how they’re doing it. They’re using the US’s own playbook of “national security” export controls, highlighting the blatant hypocrisy. They’re not even doing a full ban, just forcing licenses that will block military use. So all the hand-wringing in Washington is pure theater. They’re angry because their ability to produce weapons for future interventions in Venezuela or Iran is being critically hampered.

We’re seeing a fundamental shift here. China insulated its own supply chains first, and is now using its economic sovereignty to challenge US military dominance at its weakest point. They’re actively constraining the empire’s capacity for violence. This is a win for global peace, and the panic in the imperial press proves it.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 天前

    Yeah I did bother reading the links I post. I also have sufficient reading comprehension to understand what the link actually says. The US does not want Russia to fall into China’s sphere of influence, which the US actions are currently accomplishing, but they certainly would have no problem balkanizing Russia under western run color revolutions.

    • 52fighters
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 小时前

      I gather that English is probably a second language for you, so I assume you have confused terms. Balkanization is not a color revolution. Balkanization is when a larger country breaks apart into several smaller countries. For example, if a political crisis resulted in a power vacuum within Russia sufficient for the Buryats to declare an independent republic, along with the Yakuts and several others. That would be Balkanization. These new nations would be weak and would be vulnerable to political or military capture by China. The US does not want that. A color revolution, on the other hand, could be a number of things, but most likely a change in the leadership in Moscow without producing a plethora of fracturing states. If the current political regime in Moscow was replaced by one more friendly to liberal, democratic, and market-oriented institutions, that’s one the US would favor, especially if it prevented Balkanization.