A Democrat easily won a special election for an open House seat in Arizona, giving a bipartisan group of representatives the numbers needed to force a vote to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Adelita Grijalva, who was running to succeed her late father, Rep. Raul Grijalva, has vowed to sign a House resolution to force a vote on legislation instructing the Department of Justice to release all of its investigative files on the late sex offender.

Her victory cuts the Republican House majority to 219-214, and means she can deliver a decisive signature on the petition, which needs 218 votes to pass, CNN reported.

Its co-sponsor, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), told the outlet that a vote on his Epstein Files Transparency Act could be coming as soon as mid-October.

The Associated Press called the race for Arizona’s 7th district early Wednesday for Grijalva, who was leading her Republican opponent with 68.5 percent of the vote.

Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson has refused to call a vote on the legislation, which President Donald Trump opposes, and even released the House a day early for its August recess to avoid any votes on the files.

In response, Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna introduced a discharge petition earlier this month that would circumvent party leaders to bring the bill to the floor.

Every House Democrat has signed, along with a handful of Republican defectors. The White House has warned lawmakers that Trump views pushing for the files’ release as a “very hostile act.”

For more than a decade, Trump was good friends with Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

Although officials concluded the disgraced financier died by suicide, several MAGA factions have argued that he was murdered in his cell to protect his powerful clients.

Despite promising to release the files during his re-election bid, the president has since dismissed the effort as a Democrat-led “hoax” designed to distract from what he argues are “the most successful eight months of any president ever.”

Last week, Massie told CNN that the House could vote on his Epstein bill as soon as mid-October. Once Grijalva is sworn in and the needed signatures are secured, Massie must wait at least seven legislative days to bring the bill to the floor.

House leaders can also wait two legislative days before putting it to a vote. The bill is likely to face an uphill battle in the Senate if it clears the House, but it will force Republicans to go on record over the Epstein files.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Republicans are not behaving as if they believe they will face electoral consequences.

    Hopefully that’s because they’re in a media bubble and think what they’re doing is popular, not because they’re going to rig or cancel the elections.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think that rigging or cancelling is/was the plan but things haven’t gone as smoothly as they were hoping.

      A lot of the federal employees that they thought they got rid of when they cleaned house to get rid of any oversight, have come back by a judge’s orders.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably a bit of both. Doing whatever they want without worrying about consequences has worked out great for them so far.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah. I’m not convinced the American people in 2025 will force them to face any electoral consequences for anything - rigging or not.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      any opinion other than the second is disillusionment at best. you’re telling me the dude with a history of cheating in elections, who spent his last term sowing distrust of the voting system, may cheat again and potentially help others he likes cheat? I’m shocked.

      seriously, any other take is such quintessential American “it could never happen here!” mentality. we already know what’s gonna happen.