Different definitions of the word “landlocked” have different meanings. There’s one sense that’s more relating to logistics, where a country/state/whatever is landlocked if it doesn’t have something that functions like a port, not just a dock, or could if desired.
In that sense, Chicago is not landlocked because they have a port that can receive freight. Other places on the great lakes could although they might not due to whatever reason.
The other definition has more to do with controlling access to oceanic waters. Chicagos access to the ocean is at the mercy of Canada and all the states that control the st Lawrence seaway.
So if you’re discussing economics you care that Bolivia can get freight shipping. If you’re discussing geopolitics you care that Bolivia needs to form agreements with other countries to ensure that access remains uninterrupted.
Different definitions of the word “landlocked” have different meanings. There’s one sense that’s more relating to logistics, where a country/state/whatever is landlocked if it doesn’t have something that functions like a port, not just a dock, or could if desired.
In that sense, Chicago is not landlocked because they have a port that can receive freight. Other places on the great lakes could although they might not due to whatever reason.
The other definition has more to do with controlling access to oceanic waters. Chicagos access to the ocean is at the mercy of Canada and all the states that control the st Lawrence seaway.
So if you’re discussing economics you care that Bolivia can get freight shipping. If you’re discussing geopolitics you care that Bolivia needs to form agreements with other countries to ensure that access remains uninterrupted.