• Ardens@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t mind paying a fair price, for a service, so they should go for it. I use both Signal and Telegram, and I would pay for Telegram too, if the price was more fair…

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    All of my signal conversations have auto expiry

    Do people really use their conversation logs for things? Are you often searching your conversational logs?

    Outside of corporate compliance issues I can’t imagine the workflow for most people

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes, and yes.

      “I said this was happening 3 weeks ago. Here’s the literal text of me sending it to you and you saying ‘Okay thanks’ in reply.”

      Shuts down an argument real quick.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I never set auto expiry and often search messages. Sometimes it’s because I want to find a specific fact or datum from two years ago; other times it’s just for a reminder of a memory. On occasion, if the history wasn’t there, people might remember something important differently.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Me and my wife and wife sends information, pictures , whatever. I often search my messages for stuff

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You are right, I don’t really search my messages that much. Most important conversion is going by email for most people still.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yes, and yes. But most of it’s because I’ve moved all communication over to it.

      If I have anything that shouldn’t stick around it doesn’t stick around, If I need my grocery list from last month it’s there though.

      That said, I really don’t have any interest in backups. It’s an ephemeral stream at best that is there when I need it. And there are parts of it disappear when they’re no longer needed.

      The days where we presumed we could safely bitch about things to our friends over social media are clearly gone and privacy is of ultimate importance.

      Pretend it’s 1984, and you won’t get yourself in trouble.

    • LiamBox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Most Whatsapp users (my parents) want to keep logs of everything, its become normalised.

    • jimmy@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Though the same I like my conversations disappear when I need to reinstall Signal.

    • jimmy@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I think it’s cloud backups.

      In the GitHub commit it’s called Renew your Signal Backups subscription.

  • simple@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 day ago

    Makes sense., something as huge and expensive as Signal can’t run entirely on donations.

      • Wikipedia has way more donors, since it’s basically the only one of its kind. There is no Big Tech alternative to Wikipedia, so everyone just uses it by default. There are lots of other messengers though, so Signal isn’t the default choice.

      • simple@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Wikipedia has a lot more donors, but also their costs are probably cheaper than Signal. They mostly host text and decently compressed images, Signal uses way more bandwidth and people share high quality videos and other huge files. The servers are very expensive, there were articles estimating their cost to be around $50M per year.

  • Stomata@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    If this feature rolls out but you can’t pay for it. You can always use Molly (fork of signal). If you can support the project than do it. But if you can’t than don’t force your self

      • qweertz (they/she)@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Well, if you didn’t know, Molly is a soft fork of the Signal Android client.

        But, I think both support making local backups of your chats.
        I do so daily and keep two copies. These get synced in real time to my little NAS and/or my PC/Laptop

          • qweertz (they/she)@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Glad to be of help! I personally really like Syncthing, since it makes implementing a resilient decentralised quite easy.

            Though I would recommend you go with “Syncthing-Fork”, as iirc the “vanilla” app was put into maintenance mode or smth like that

  • pemptago@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Signal backups are an issue. They keep growing. I need to look into a solution sooner or later that isn’t just buying a phone with more space. I’d like to find ways to reduce the size and keep managing the backups myself, but that’s gonna take time. If they offer a secure, private, and affordable service, I’d prolly just redirect my donations to that.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It would be nice if the backups were split into time-indexed files so I could move the old parts to cheap external hard drives and only keep recent backups on my expensive phone storage.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      honestly thats why I don’t like signal and simplex for people who send lots of images. something server-based is much more suitable for them, like Matrix. that is, if their apps were more stable. there’s also the security about metadata, but for most people that’s probably not a huge concern

  • cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    As long as they dont shove it down our throats, and then expand and expand and expand the features that are in their paid tier, and make you feel lesser for choosing their local only unpaid mode, and dont make the unpaid mode inconvenient with dark patterns.

    Its happened too much, I’ve asked my friends to hop through so many different platforms over the years and decades

    It always starts with something thats reasonable, and every time thus far, it expands into something I hate.

  • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have no issue with this, I personally wouldn’t use it but I get that they need to make money (which is why i have a recurrent donation every month).

    If this helps them to do that, then so be it