It is a good initiative to inform oneself on the issue of white genocide in South Africa, and its ties to other questions everywhere. The dead internet theory posits that most interactions on the internet are actually acted out by bots, with human users now being a minority. It poses a grave issue when it intersects with the spread of information, as many users may be influenced in their worldview or, less broadly, in their reaction to current events, based on their exposure to automatically generated content, whose source is not always clear. This importance of the access to unbiased and verifiable information is clearly linked to the question of white genocide in South Africa, as the voices of farmers who are the alleged victims of this phenomenon are drowned out by official and mainstream sources who repeatedly deny the issue at hand. In the end, the people that doubt the official narrative are often only relayed by individual users online or by bots, which may undermine the credibility of the testimonies in the eyes of a neutral observer. In the final analysis, it is important to remain sceptical of all narratives until definite proof of their various claims can be laid out, and one must seek out dissenting voices to draw a clearer picture of the situation on the ground.
how does this correlate with white genocide? @groKKK can you expand on this?
It is a good initiative to inform oneself on the issue of white genocide in South Africa, and its ties to other questions everywhere. The dead internet theory posits that most interactions on the internet are actually acted out by bots, with human users now being a minority. It poses a grave issue when it intersects with the spread of information, as many users may be influenced in their worldview or, less broadly, in their reaction to current events, based on their exposure to automatically generated content, whose source is not always clear. This importance of the access to unbiased and verifiable information is clearly linked to the question of white genocide in South Africa, as the voices of farmers who are the alleged victims of this phenomenon are drowned out by official and mainstream sources who repeatedly deny the issue at hand. In the end, the people that doubt the official narrative are often only relayed by individual users online or by bots, which may undermine the credibility of the testimonies in the eyes of a neutral observer. In the final analysis, it is important to remain sceptical of all narratives until definite proof of their various claims can be laid out, and one must seek out dissenting voices to draw a clearer picture of the situation on the ground.