• keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 days ago

        It is interesting the rather large number of people that think that Hasbro cops will break down your door and ban you from D&D if your group agrees to some other rules. The number of times I see the question “If my gaming group agrees to play by some rule, is that allowed in D&D?” (or whichever system) is… Well, it’s a lot

        • fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 days ago

          On the other hand Hasbro is the only ttrpg publisher that’s actually sent Pinkertons to break down someone’s door, so the concern isn’t entirely unfounded

      • SpiderFarmer [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        THAC0, twenty different charts, attributes being split into two different categories, percentile rolls. I love the system on some level, but you can apply rule zero to anything to claim it’s simple.

        • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yeah, that’s why the OSR exists, I think. I have a copy of Old School Essentials, which is basically just a rewritten 2E, but one of the first things they did was convert THAC0 to the system 5E uses, for everything.

          • SpiderFarmer [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            Hey, I love the system for what it is. I think it’s better for fine-tuning a character sheet than 3.5, plus some settings in that era had post-nuclear devastation and canonically bisexual elves.

            But I’m just calling it out on thinking grammar was the most mindracking thing.