• DoYouNot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This data shouldn’t be displayed like this. This is a cumulative distribution function, displayed as a bar chart. As this is cumulative data, it should be displayed continuously with a line or an area.

    • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Hey hey hey this is data is beautiful, not data is functional! It’s gotta have mass market appeal and not just appeal for you data nerds!

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It’s not just the 0% and -100% that’s weird…

    Like, the graph is just wrong in a lot of different ways. Not just that, you don’t seem to understand what a distribution is.

    This shows the height distribution between males and females. Example almost 100% of people under 5 ft are female

    It’s been a while since I took a stats class, but this is gibberish.

  • Sackeshi@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Interesting fact I found that just 4% of Males are shorter than 54% of females

  • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    So knowing a disproportionate amount of women who are 5’-10" and over means I must live in the enlightened zone of the 99th percentile.