Do you agree that Brexit has been “a pointless waste of time, money and effort”?

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s the point of civil debates. To discuss and challenge the ideas in order to reach a better understanding. If you’re simply going to tell people to “fuck right off” without addressing their concerns it shows a deep lack of understanding of their concerns and only helps to push them further away from your own position.

      What advantage do you get from insulting someone? Whilst I don’t agree with the original post, I don’t want to excuse this behaviour of the reply.

      • ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m saying its perfectly reasonable for some to meet one insult with another, just because you don’t see the first insult doesn’t mean its not there or that its anyone else’s obligation to spell things out for you. also, sorry, but “pushing people away from a position” is preposterous. this “look how you made me vote!” stuff is so childish.

      • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If you’re simply going to tell people to “fuck right off” without addressing their concerns it shows a deep lack of understanding of their concerns

        no it doesn’t, people can have “concerns” that are fundamentally incorrect or in bad faith

        • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not saying that people don’t have incorrect concerns. I’m saying how does saying “fuck off” as a first response help? You’re advocating division with that attitude. I’m saying help those people rather than othering them.