• Successful_Try543@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yet, we don’t want the pollinators to get smashed by the trams. Thus, flowering plants probably aren’t a good idea.

    • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Eh, I’m not an expert but I think most trams move slow enough that they aren’t going to take out pollinators. They won’t crush them on the flowers, only risk would be when flying in the air. A decent aerodynamic deflector of some kind would probably help. The modern equivalent of a cattle guard on an old steam train.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      FYI, grasses are flowering plants too. We just typically mow turfgrasses before they grow tall enough to produce them, and even when they do, the flowers themselves are typically very small.

      For example, bermudagrass flowers:


      Honestly, I doubt that it’d much of a problem to use things with bigger flowers – bees and such can probably get out of the way of a tram.

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Of course, grasses are neither a fern nor moss. I was thinking of flowering plants that do attract pollinators, not those that make use of wind for pollination.

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If we run trams over grass for long enough, perhaps eventually a plant will evolve which uses the motion of a tram to spread its pollen.