On May 12, California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, demanded that cities throughout the state adopt anti-camping ordinances that would effectively ban public homelessness by requiring unhoused individuals to relocate every 72 hours.

While presented as a humanitarian effort to reduce homelessness, the new policy victimizes California’s growing unhoused population—approximately 187,000 people—by tying funding in Proposition 1 to local laws banning sleeping or camping on public land.

In his announcement, Newsom pushed local governments to adopt the draconian ordinances “without delay.”

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be fair, the articles I’ve read about this have also indicated he wants to allocate three billion dollars to address homelessness, and that’s actually a good thing, as the current policy of rampant vagrancy addressed by policing and imprisonment is not only ineffective, but vastly more costly.

    But even so, it’s still a ghoulish thing to say, and buckle up, because this motherfucker’s going to be the next Democratic candidate for president.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      the articles I’ve read about this have also indicated he wants to allocate three billion dollars to address homelessness

      It will be 3 billion for hostile architecture and police crackdowns probably.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sadly, history would suggest that’s eventually what happens. Democrats, for all their lofty rhetoric, love elevating the police as a militarized, licensed gang.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah. Actually housing everyone needing it (and not in a shelter or concentration camp) would even cost less than the huge amount of hostile architecture and funding police harrasment*, cruelty is the point, and it is firmly in capitalist logic because this system need the visibly heavily opressed pariah class to discipline workers.

          *It’s not some nebulous “already spend on police” cathegory as some people claim every time the topic surfaces. Manpower, supplies and time used by police for that are clearly calculable.