As in, if you were applying to delivery positions but you know they’ll test for cannabis, would you even apply / interview? What about in a jurisdiction where the drug is recreationally legal?

  • ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I did when I was in the army, and the moment I was in the clear I went back to my vice, lol. But not for any other job (I needed the army for papers!), fuck that. I don’t live in the US though so I should be good. 🙏

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I worked for a tech company in a legal state 5-10 years back. There were a lot of stoners there because most people couldn’t handle their bullshit in a sober state of mind and the company just wanted asses in seats to fulfill their contract obligations. I’m pretty sure Subway would go out of business if the weed disappeared. Your best bet is to make good enough friends with someone who works there (as a normal low-level employee) that you can ask an honest question without getting narced on. At my tech job, I treated the stoners with the same mild indifference as everyone else. Let me do my job, pretend to be normal, and don’t do anything I can’t ignore. Do not brag about smoking weed in front of management or anyone who makes enough money to care. The only people who got pinched did it to themselves.

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Not unless I had no other choice.

    Basically I’d have to face losing my house before I’d choose a job that drug tests outside of new hires or when somebody fucks up big time and it’s suspicious.

    I’d also leave ASAP.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Following through on an interview loop for a company in which I had little interest kept me on the recruiter’s radar, and a couple years later she got me into my current role which I love.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Did you not get that job because you failed a drug test though? I’m going to assume no.

          If you get fired from a job that a recruiter got you because you failed a drug test, you’ll be blacklisted by not only that recruiter but most other recruiters in the area. Source: few good friends who are recruiters for prominent recruitment firms, they tell me stories.

  • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    My entire career was applying for places that regularly drug tested while being an active cannabis user.

    I had a whizzinator, realistic looking penis with a bag of synthetic urine

    I’d used it about 30 times and replaced it on occasion, never once even suspected

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No. While I am not a recreational drug user, drug testing is a gross violation of natural human rights and I would not want to be associated in any way with a company that engages in such unethical behavior.

      • ilmagico@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        How common is such a test in the US? I work in the US and so far, I’ve never been asked to perform a drug test, ever. Then again, maybe I’ve been lucky…

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          It isn’t nearly as common anymore for anything that doesn’t involve heavy machinery because it costs companies a ton of money to do it all the time.

        • MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s fairly common. A lot of higher end jobs do it as a way of screening out undesirables. And most of the others as a way of cutting down on liability. It can depend on the organization itself. If it’s a small organization they may not care or may only care if you use the heavier stuff.

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I live in Ohio and am currently looking for work.

    I’m still paying to places that say drug testing, but not places that specify thc testing.

    As far as I’m concerned, it’s a legal state, and unless they have similar testing and employment rules for alcohol (which they wouldn’t be able to since it doesn’t show up two weeks later) then I should be able to smoke when I want, off the clock.

    If they test and it prevents me from getting the job, I feel slightly satisfied I wasted their time and money. If they follow up and ask about it, I will tell them straight up it’s legal in this state and they’re only limiting their options by refusing to hire people who do a legal thing.

    It’s probably just wasting my own time, but hey I’ve got time to waste.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Would you take the job if offered, knowing you’d need to restrict your cannabis use on workdays so you’re not driving high? If so, why not go for the interview with the same number of hours post-toke as you’d consider driving for the job? If you pass you pass, and if not, maybe a driving-around job is not a good fit for you. If it’s not legal, scrap the whole plan, you don’t need to be courting legal trouble.

  • thisbenzingring
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been drug tested hours after taking bong hits… honestly 2x

    got both jobs because when one asked, I was honest and told them it wouldn’t interfere with my work and I’d never show up stoned. Second job actually put me into a group that smoked way more than I would normally and they were screening for other drugs. THC wasn’t a concern.

  • psychonova@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Personally, no. But I’m the kind of person who walked out of a doctor’s office when they told me they wanted to regularly drug test me if I wanted them to take over my prescriptions for meds I was already on.

  • kungen@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I was desperate, and too dependent on cannabis to easily quit, then I guess? But ideally I’d quit first, as it’d become more of a legal risk if I was to drive commercially and have metabolites in my blood (doesn’t matter if you’re impaired or not)